Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Feb 27, 2024·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

Pittsburgh Penguins 4, Vancouver Canucks 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 51% of the time.

VAN winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
PIT0921211217440
VAN2141120801335

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:23VANNils HoglanderAssists: Tyler Myers, Ilya Mikheyev · Snap, 0.11 xG0–1
  2. P1 17:43VANBrock BoeserPPAssists: J.T. Miller, Filip Hronek · Snap, 0.14 xG0–2
  3. P2 2:13PITRickard RakellAssists: Sidney Crosby · Wrist, 0.23 xG1–2
  4. P2 9:36PITRickard RakellPPAssists: Sidney Crosby, Evgeni Malkin · Tip-in, 0.12 xG2–2
  5. P2 10:05VANJ.T. MillerSHAssists: Elias Pettersson, Thatcher Demko · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–3
  6. P3 9:45PITLars EllerAssists: Valtteri Puustinen, Kris Letang · Wrist, 0.06 xG3–3
  7. OT 1:42PITErik KarlssonGWGAssists: Lars Eller, Reilly Smith · Wrist, 0.15 xG4–3
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 2:00VANFilip Hronek: Holding2 min
  2. P1 7:12PITKris Letang: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  3. P1 17:07PITErik Karlsson: Slashing2 min · PPG
  4. P1 19:34PITJesse Puljujarvi: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 8:44VANNikita Zadorov: Tripping2 min · PPG
  6. P2 8:47VANTyler Myers: High sticking2 min
  7. P2 18:45PITEvgeni Malkin: Holding2 min
  8. P3 5:59VANElias Pettersson: High sticking2 min
  9. P3 12:58VANBrock Boeser: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
46% to win54% to win
← PIT attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Miller won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITVAN
40Shots on goal35
3.8Expected goals3.7
62Shot attempts66
30Faceoffs won30
5Power plays4
8Penalty minutes10
23Hits24
17Blocked shots10
9Giveaways7
5Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestMalkin – Puustinen – O'Connor9:09

    xG 0.48–0.15 (76%)attempts 12–8goals 0–0

  2. Malkin – Harkins – Puustinen2:14

    xG 0.16–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  3. Crosby – Smith – Rakell12:22

    xG 0.77–0.84 (48%)attempts 14–18goals 1–1

  4. Eller – Puljujarvi – Bemstrom5:15

    xG 0.02–0.30 (5%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Ruhwedel – Graves10:07

    xG 0.15–0.38 (28%)attempts 6–9goals 0–0

  2. Letang – Joseph11:15

    xG 0.35–0.69 (33%)attempts 9–14goals 1–0

  3. Karlsson – Pettersson16:57

    xG 0.78–1.25 (38%)attempts 15–24goals 1–1

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestPettersson – Hoglander – Mikheyev9:37

    xG 1.01–0.33 (75%)attempts 11–9goals 1–1

  2. Miller – Boeser – Suter11:43

    xG 0.83–0.24 (78%)attempts 15–9goals 0–0

  3. Di Giuseppe – Blueger – Lafferty6:45

    xG 0.59–0.38 (61%)attempts 16–2goals 0–1

  4. Lindholm – Garland – Bains8:56

    xG 0.07–0.55 (11%)attempts 3–14goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCole – Myers10:35

    xG 1.29–0.44 (75%)attempts 21–10goals 1–1

  2. Hronek – Hughes17:36

    xG 0.80–0.56 (59%)attempts 19–11goals 0–0

  3. Zadorov – Juulsen11:14

    xG 0.26–0.64 (29%)attempts 5–16goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 3.7 xGPIT 3.8 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 93/100 · #120 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.42 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 14% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +30 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 51% of the time.

VAN winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).