Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Mar 10, 2024·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Edmonton Oilers 4, Pittsburgh Penguins 0

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 60% of the time.

PIT winsEDM wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
EDM213012217442
PIT013012016041

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:08EDMConnor McDavidGWGUnassisted · Snap, 0.22 xG1–0
  2. P1 8:53EDMMattias EkholmAssists: Evan Bouchard, Connor McDavid · Slap, 0.02 xG2–0
  3. P3 10:42EDMDarnell NurseAssists: Connor McDavid, Ryan Nugent-Hopkins · Wrist, 0.09 xG3–0
  4. P3 15:58EDMDarnell NurseAssists: Mattias Ekholm · Wrist, 0.08 xG4–0
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 2:37EDMDarnell Nurse: Interference2 min
  2. P1 13:27EDMRyan Nugent-Hopkins: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 14:14PITJeff Carter: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 5:44EDMMattias Ekholm: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 6:40PITEmil Bemstrom: Too many men on the ice2 min
  6. P2 10:35EDMWarren Foegele: High sticking double minor4 min
  7. P2 10:35PITJohn Ludvig: Instigator2 min
  8. P2 10:35EDMWarren Foegele: Fighting5 min
  9. P2 10:35PITJohn Ludvig: Fighting5 min
  10. P2 10:35PITJohn Ludvig: Instigator misconduct10 min
  11. P2 17:05PITBryan Rust: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  12. P3 13:54PITSidney Crosby: Hooking2 min
  13. P3 18:59EDMVincent Desharnais: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

EDM00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
46% to win54% to win
← EDM attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Malkin won the faceoff against Draisaitl
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

EDMPIT
42Shots on goal41
4.1Expected goals3.4
74Shot attempts72
24Faceoffs won32
4Power plays5
17Penalty minutes25
4Hits16
17Blocked shots15
6Giveaways9
10Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestHenrique – Kane – Brown8:48

    xG 0.20–0.12 (62%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0

  2. Hyman – Nugent-Hopkins – McDavid10:20

    xG 0.86–0.93 (48%)attempts 16–13goals 3–0

  3. Draisaitl – Foegele – McLeod11:11

    xG 0.61–0.75 (45%)attempts 11–14goals 0–0

  4. Perry – Janmark – Ryan4:53

    xG 0.08–0.37 (18%)attempts 3–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkholm – Bouchard13:24

    xG 1.02–0.78 (57%)attempts 18–14goals 2–0

  2. Ceci – Kulak14:14

    xG 0.59–0.69 (46%)attempts 13–20goals 0–0

  3. Nurse – Desharnais12:33

    xG 0.60–0.93 (39%)attempts 14–20goals 1–0

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCrosby – Rust – Bunting12:19

    xG 1.16–0.78 (60%)attempts 21–15goals 0–2

  2. Malkin – Smith – Puustinen12:33

    xG 0.69–0.40 (63%)attempts 16–10goals 0–0

  3. Carter – Acciari – Gruden5:03

    xG 0.28–0.14 (67%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

  4. Eller – Rakell – Bemstrom6:27

    xG 0.23–0.09 (71%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKarlsson – Graves13:04

    xG 0.73–0.40 (64%)attempts 16–14goals 0–0

  2. Karlsson – Ludvig2:52

    xG 0.18–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Joseph – Ludvig3:13

    xG 0.03–0.02 (52%)attempts 4–1goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 3.4 xGEDM 4.1 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITEDM

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it EDM. Dots are goals.

Excitement 9/100 · #1206 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.71 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
EDM 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 60% of the time.

PIT winsEDM wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − EDM), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).