Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Mar 18, 2024·Climate Pledge Arena, Seattle

Buffalo Sabres 6, Seattle Kraken 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 58% of the time.

SEA winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF31021218630
SEA2907018234

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:24SEAJordan EberleAssists: Eeli Tolvanen, Brian Dumoulin · Wrist, 0.08 xG0–1
  2. P1 0:49BUFTage ThompsonAssists: Zemgus Girgensons, Alex Tuch · Snap, 0.04 xG1–1
  3. P1 3:56BUFJeff SkinnerAssists: Peyton Krebs · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–1
  4. P1 5:41BUFAlex TuchGWGAssists: Tage Thompson, Zemgus Girgensons · Wrist, 0.07 xG3–1
  5. P1 14:36SEAMatty BeniersPPAssists: Eeli Tolvanen, Justin Schultz · Wrist, 0.23 xG3–2
  6. P2 10:36BUFOwen PowerAssists: Dylan Cozens, JJ Peterka · Wrist, 0.10 xG4–2
  7. P2 11:18BUFJeff SkinnerUnassisted · Wrist, 0.08 xG5–2
  8. P3 18:01BUFJeff SkinnerAssists: Jordan Greenway, Jacob Bryson · Slap, 0.17 xG6–2
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 13:46BUFPeyton Krebs: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  2. P1 19:30SEAEeli Tolvanen: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 6:08SEAEeli Tolvanen: Holding2 min
  4. P2 13:00BUFHenri Jokiharju: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 16:00BUFZemgus Girgensons: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  6. P3 7:19BUFAlex Tuch: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SEA
46% to win54% to win
← BUF attackSEA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Cozens won the faceoff against Beniers
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFSEA
30Shots on goal34
2.8Expected goals3.2
56Shot attempts70
31Faceoffs won20
2Power plays5
10Penalty minutes4
28Hits38
22Blocked shots10
7Giveaways1
8Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestCozens – Peterka – Benson8:03

    xG 0.82–0.11 (88%)attempts 13–7goals 1–0

  2. Skinner – Greenway – Krebs8:51

    xG 0.68–0.01 (98%)attempts 11–6goals 3–0

  3. Olofsson – Jost – Robinson8:16

    xG 0.29–0.49 (38%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0

  4. Girgensons – Tuch – Thompson9:21

    xG 0.40–0.80 (33%)attempts 10–13goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestClifton – Bryson12:08

    xG 0.50–0.39 (56%)attempts 10–12goals 1–0

  2. Jokiharju – Power12:01

    xG 0.74–0.64 (54%)attempts 16–12goals 2–0

  3. Dahlin – Byram15:48

    xG 0.79–0.88 (47%)attempts 18–16goals 2–1

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. bestEberle – Tolvanen – Beniers12:40

    xG 0.97–0.24 (80%)attempts 13–9goals 1–1

  2. Bjorkstrand – Burakovsky – McCann8:28

    xG 0.32–0.18 (64%)attempts 10–5goals 0–1

  3. Tatar – Bellemare – Tanev4:56

    xG 0.10–0.25 (29%)attempts 4–5goals 0–1

  4. Gourde – Tanev – Kartye2:20

    xG 0.06–0.30 (17%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestDumoulin – Larsson14:26

    xG 0.91–0.55 (62%)attempts 19–10goals 1–1

  2. Schultz – Evans9:25

    xG 0.66–0.42 (61%)attempts 12–11goals 0–2

  3. Dumoulin – Borgen2:08

    xG 0.00–0.07 (0%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SEA 3.2 xGBUF 2.8 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SEABUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SEA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SEA is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 55/100 · #652 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.36 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 30% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50SEA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 58% of the time.

SEA winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (SEA − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).