Sat, Mar 23, 2024·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville
Detroit Red Wings 0, Nashville Predators 1
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 53% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DET | 08 | 09 | 05 | 022 |
| NSH | 013 | 07 | 112 | 132 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P3 14:46NSHFilip ForsbergGWGAssists: Roman Josi, Gustav Nyquist · Wrist, 0.08 xG0–1
Penalties (8)
- P1 0:34DETAndrew Copp: Roughing2 min
- P1 0:34NSHKiefer Sherwood: Roughing2 min
- P1 7:01NSHAlexandre Carrier: Cross checking2 min
- P1 14:11DETSimon Edvinsson: Interference2 min
- P2 4:55DETMoritz Seider: Fighting5 min
- P2 4:55NSHFilip Forsberg: Fighting5 min
- P2 6:34NSHJason Zucker: Tripping2 min
- P2 15:18NSHRoman Josi: Tripping2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Copp won the faceoff against McCarron
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Detroit Red Wings
Forward lines
- bestFabbri – Czarnik – Veleno6:49
xG 0.29–0.08 (79%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0
- Perron – Larkin – Raymond10:05
xG 0.22–0.30 (42%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0
- Kane – Compher – DeBrincat9:23
xG 0.24–0.37 (40%)attempts 8–15goals 0–0
- Copp – Fischer – Rasmussen9:26
xG 0.41–0.58 (41%)attempts 5–17goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- bestChiarot – Seider11:30
xG 0.50–0.31 (62%)attempts 8–11goals 0–0
- Petry – Chiarot2:52
xG 0.20–0.10 (65%)attempts 3–5goals 0–1
- Maatta – Gostisbehere8:57
xG 0.43–0.38 (53%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0
Nashville Predators
Forward lines
- bestZucker – Sissons – Evangelista2:01
xG 0.26–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0
- Zucker – Sissons – Beauvillier5:19
xG 0.22–0.07 (77%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0
- Jankowski – Novak – Evangelista5:35
xG 0.33–0.21 (60%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0
- Nyquist – O'Reilly – Forsberg10:06
xG 0.45–0.52 (47%)attempts 18–8goals 1–0
Defence pairs
- bestMcDonagh – Josi3:16
xG 0.14–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 0–0
- Josi – Barrie2:18
xG 0.11–0.03 (77%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0
- McDonagh – Barrie12:16
xG 0.48–0.44 (52%)attempts 13–14goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it DET. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 53% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (NSH − DET), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).