Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Mar 24, 2024·Ball Arena, Denver

Pittsburgh Penguins 4, Colorado Avalanche 5 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 59% of the time.

COL winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
PIT2152120700434
COL0421521011530

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:53PITJesse PuljujarviAssists: Reilly Smith, Sidney Crosby · Bat, 0.23 xG1–0
  2. P1 15:11PITBryan RustAssists: Sidney Crosby · Wrist, 0.19 xG2–0
  3. P2 13:47PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Valtteri Puustinen · Tip-in, 0.04 xG3–0
  4. P2 15:40PITPierre-Olivier JosephAssists: Sidney Crosby, Kris Letang · Wrist, 0.04 xG4–0
  5. P2 16:05COLSean WalkerAssists: Ross Colton, Miles Wood · Wrist, 0.05 xG4–1
  6. P2 19:30COLYakov TreninAssists: Brandon Duhaime · Wrist, 0.20 xG4–2
  7. P3 3:32COLJonathan DrouinAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Devon Toews · Snap, 0.08 xG4–3
  8. P3 15:22COLNathan MacKinnonAssists: Jonathan Drouin, Devon Toews · Snap, 0.04 xG4–4
  9. OT 0:54COLJonathan DrouinGWGAssists: Cale Makar, Nathan MacKinnon · Wrist, 0.28 xG4–5
Penalties (4)
  1. P1 5:32PITJesse Puljujarvi: Holding2 min
  2. P2 9:17COLDevon Toews: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  3. P3 6:10COLBrandon Duhaime: Tripping2 min
  4. P3 11:05PITMarcus Pettersson: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
46% to win54% to win
← PIT attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00MacKinnon won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITCOL
34Shots on goal30
2.6Expected goals3.1
65Shot attempts65
32Faceoffs won25
2Power plays2
4Penalty minutes4
21Hits15
16Blocked shots16
0Giveaways4
12Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCrosby – Rust – O'Connor12:28

    xG 0.88–0.63 (58%)attempts 18–16goals 1–3

  2. Eller – Smith – Puljujarvi3:11

    xG 0.03–0.10 (22%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

  3. Eller – Smith – Puustinen7:21

    xG 0.12–0.24 (33%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

  4. Malkin – Rakell – Bunting13:32

    xG 0.29–0.75 (28%)attempts 14–15goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestLetang – Joseph15:46

    xG 0.76–0.59 (57%)attempts 15–17goals 2–1

  2. St. Ivany – Ludvig8:14

    xG 0.19–0.21 (47%)attempts 8–8goals 1–0

  3. Letang – Pettersson3:11

    xG 0.07–0.26 (22%)attempts 1–5goals 0–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestMacKinnon – Drouin – Rantanen5:44

    xG 0.34–0.07 (83%)attempts 11–3goals 1–0

  2. Lehkonen – Drouin – Mittelstadt4:43

    xG 0.19–0.07 (72%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  3. Nichushkin – Rantanen – Mittelstadt4:44

    xG 0.33–0.22 (60%)attempts 6–7goals 0–1

  4. Parise – Wood – Colton7:26

    xG 0.19–0.08 (70%)attempts 8–3goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGirard – Walker5:25

    xG 0.43–0.01 (97%)attempts 5–4goals 1–0

  2. Johnson – Walker6:19

    xG 0.29–0.25 (53%)attempts 7–8goals 1–0

  3. Johnson – Manson3:52

    xG 0.08–0.11 (43%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 3.1 xGPIT 2.6 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 94/100 · #91 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.99 · 8 goals in reach · 4-goal lead cutComeback index 2% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +39 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 59% of the time.

COL winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).