Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 28, 2024·Climate Pledge Arena, Seattle

Anaheim Ducks 2, Seattle Kraken 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 82% of the time.

SEA winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA0100429223
SEA0819311428

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 9:03SEAJaden SchwartzPPAssists: Jordan Eberle, Jared McCann · Tip-in, 0.17 xG0–1
  2. P3 2:08ANAIsac LundeströmSHAssists: Jakob Silfverberg, Urho Vaakanainen · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–1
  3. P3 2:52ANAJakob SilfverbergSHUnassisted · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–1
  4. P3 6:25SEAAndre BurakovskyPPAssists: Justin Schultz, Jared McCann · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–2
  5. P3 13:03SEATye KartyeGWGAssists: Yanni Gourde, Jamie Oleksiak · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–3
  6. P3 15:35SEAMatty BeniersPPAssists: Jared McCann, Andre Burakovsky · Tip-in, 0.13 xG2–4
Penalties (17)
  1. P1 0:10SEAAndre Burakovsky: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 2:20ANATrevor Zegras: Interference2 min
  3. P1 12:37SEAWill Borgen: Interference2 min
  4. P2 5:05ANABen Meyers: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 8:54ANACam Fowler: Slashing2 min · PPG
  6. P2 13:24ANAAlex Killorn: High sticking2 min
  7. P3 1:57ANAWilliam Lagesson: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 3:24SEAJared McCann: High sticking2 min
  9. P3 4:50ANARyan Strome: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  10. P3 4:50SEATye Kartye: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 5:21ANATrevor Zegras: Holding2 min
  12. P3 5:21ANATrevor Zegras: Cross checking2 min
  13. P3 9:12SEABrandon Tanev: Fighting5 min
  14. P3 9:12ANAWilliam Lagesson: Fighting5 min
  15. P3 10:49ANAJackson LaCombe: Holding the stick2 min
  16. P3 13:27ANAFrank Vatrano: Cross checking2 min
  17. P3 14:50ANAAlex Killorn: Cross checking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SEA
46% to win54% to win
← ANA attackSEA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Gourde won the faceoff against McTavish
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANASEA
23Shots on goal28
2.0Expected goals4.1
51Shot attempts54
27Faceoffs won24
3Power plays10
27Penalty minutes13
32Hits23
10Blocked shots15
4Giveaways1
8Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestStrome – Vatrano – Zegras6:35

    xG 0.42–0.06 (88%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  2. Strome – Vatrano – McTavish2:07

    xG 0.03–0.01 (79%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  3. Lundeström – Leason – Meyers5:03

    xG 0.01–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  4. Killorn – Terry – Carlsson9:35

    xG 0.02–0.19 (11%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLagesson – Lindstrom9:42

    xG 0.37–0.26 (59%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0

  2. Fowler – Vaakanainen12:08

    xG 0.28–0.27 (51%)attempts 9–6goals 0–0

  3. LaCombe – Mintyukov10:29

    xG 0.02–0.03 (44%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. bestGourde – Burakovsky – Tanev5:57

    xG 0.39–0.01 (98%)attempts 8–2goals 0–0

  2. Gourde – Tanev – Kartye2:24

    xG 0.01–0.00 (97%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Eberle – Schwartz – McCann6:16

    xG 0.02–0.03 (47%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  4. Kartye – Winterton – Morrison5:58

    xG 0.05–0.21 (18%)attempts 1–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Oleksiak – Borgen10:04

    xG 0.29–0.24 (55%)attempts 9–7goals 1–0

  2. Dumoulin – Larsson13:52

    xG 0.23–0.24 (50%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0

  3. Schultz – Evans7:58

    xG 0.06–0.14 (29%)attempts 2–7goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SEA 4.1 xGANA 2.0 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SEAANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SEA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SEA is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 81/100 · #295 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.19 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 22% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50SEA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +34 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 82% of the time.

SEA winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (SEA − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).