Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Apr 4, 2024·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

Los Angeles Kings 2, San Jose Sharks 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 72% of the time.

SJS winsLAK wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
LAK21204011227
SJS080513116

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:55LAKAdrian KempeUnassisted · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–0
  2. P1 11:13LAKAkil ThomasGWGAssists: Jordan Spence, Pierre-Luc Dubois · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–0
  3. P3 18:08SJSKlim KostinAssists: Mikael Granlund, William Eklund · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–1
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 19:24SJSCalen Addison: Interference2 min
  2. P2 6:19LAKKevin Fiala: Interference2 min
  3. P2 12:32LAKAndreas Englund: Slashing2 min
  4. P2 12:32SJSLuke Kunin: Slashing2 min
  5. P2 12:32LAKAndreas Englund: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 12:32SJSLuke Kunin: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 13:59LAKJordan Spence: High sticking double minor4 min
  8. P2 19:03SJSKlim Kostin: Holding the stick2 min
  9. P3 3:05SJSCalen Addison: Hooking2 min
  10. P3 14:51SJSMarc-Edouard Vlasic: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

LAK00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
46% to win54% to win
← LAK attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kopitar won the faceoff against Granlund
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

LAKSJS
27Shots on goal16
2.8Expected goals1.6
48Shot attempts36
25Faceoffs won24
4Power plays3
13Penalty minutes15
10Hits22
9Blocked shots13
5Giveaways9
7Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestLewis – Fiala – Lizotte5:37

    xG 0.24–0.14 (63%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  2. Fiala – Arvidsson – Lizotte2:15

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  3. Kopitar – Kempe – Byfield6:26

    xG 0.25–0.28 (47%)attempts 8–6goals 1–0

  4. Arvidsson – Dubois – Moore4:49

    xG 0.01–0.04 (14%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestDoughty – Anderson13:32

    xG 0.74–0.15 (83%)attempts 10–6goals 0–0

  2. Gavrikov – Roy12:11

    xG 0.25–0.02 (93%)attempts 8–6goals 0–0

  3. Doughty – Moverare3:12

    xG 0.00–0.02 (0%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. Granlund – Kostin – Zetterlund9:42

    xG 0.22–0.25 (47%)attempts 5–8goals 0–1

  2. Studnicka – Zadina – Bordeleau7:33

    xG 0.14–0.21 (40%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  3. Hoffman – Labanc – Sturm5:55

    xG 0.03–0.34 (8%)attempts 2–7goals 0–0

  4. Bailey – Kunin – Eklund8:01

    xG 0.11–0.77 (13%)attempts 4–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBurroughs – Ferraro7:16

    xG 0.37–0.31 (55%)attempts 7–7goals 0–2

  2. Addison – Thrun7:00

    xG 0.21–0.26 (45%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  3. Burroughs – Thrun4:57

    xG 0.02–0.14 (12%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 1.6 xGLAK 2.8 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSLAK

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it LAK. Dots are goals.

Excitement 12/100 · #1169 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.80 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
LAK 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 72% of the time.

SJS winsLAK wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − LAK), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).