Fri, Apr 5, 2024·KeyBank Center, Buffalo
Philadelphia Flyers 2, Buffalo Sabres 4
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 67% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | 010 | 113 | 111 | 234 |
| BUF | 14 | 28 | 17 | 419 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 10:01BUFTage ThompsonAssists: JJ Peterka, Alex Tuch · Wrist, 0.16 xG0–1
- P2 9:07PHINoah CatesAssists: Owen Tippett, Cam York · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–1
- P2 14:51BUFRasmus DahlinAssists: Tage Thompson, Alex Tuch · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–2
- P2 19:54BUFJack QuinnGWGAssists: Zach Benson, Owen Power · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–3
- P3 9:19PHIOwen TippettAssists: Travis Sanheim, Scott Laughton · Slap, 0.04 xG2–3
- P3 13:59BUFJack QuinnAssists: Zach Benson, Dylan Cozens · Wrist, 0.17 xG2–4
Penalties (4)
- P1 1:13BUFBowen Byram: Slashing2 min
- P1 19:45BUFHenri Jokiharju: Roughing2 min
- P2 13:55BUFJeff Skinner: Cross checking2 min
- P2 13:55PHITravis Konecny: Cross checking2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Thompson won the faceoff against Frost
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Philadelphia Flyers
Forward lines
- bestHathaway – Poehling – Lycksell8:19
xG 0.33–0.07 (82%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0
- Atkinson – Cates – Farabee3:03
xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0
- Laughton – Tippett – Brink7:44
xG 0.23–0.14 (62%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0
- Konecny – Frost – Foerster12:06
xG 0.53–0.55 (49%)attempts 13–12goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- bestSeeler – Drysdale15:09
xG 0.69–0.28 (71%)attempts 17–12goals 0–0
- Sanheim – York16:14
xG 0.77–0.71 (52%)attempts 13–16goals 2–2
- Staal – Johnson11:20
xG 0.34–0.31 (52%)attempts 15–10goals 0–1
Buffalo Sabres
Forward lines
- bestCozens – Quinn – Benson8:28
xG 0.56–0.28 (67%)attempts 11–7goals 2–0
- Skinner – Krebs – Rousek8:09
xG 0.12–0.06 (65%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0
- Girgensons – Olofsson – Robinson6:33
xG 0.08–0.55 (13%)attempts 6–13goals 0–1
- Tuch – Thompson – Peterka13:59
xG 0.69–1.25 (36%)attempts 12–21goals 1–0
Defence pairs
- bestDahlin – Power16:10
xG 0.78–0.61 (56%)attempts 15–17goals 3–0
- Clifton – Bryson11:07
xG 0.31–0.53 (37%)attempts 9–6goals 0–0
- Jokiharju – Byram15:37
xG 0.26–1.26 (17%)attempts 8–28goals 0–1
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 67% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (BUF − PHI), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).