Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Apr 9, 2024·Centre Bell, Montreal

Philadelphia Flyers 3, Montréal Canadiens 9

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 54% of the time.

MTL winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI010012314336
MTL1851438930

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:05MTLJuraj SlafkovskýAssists: Mike Matheson, Cole Caufield · Tip-in, 0.20 xG0–1
  2. P2 8:43MTLJuraj SlafkovskýAssists: Nick Suzuki, Mike Matheson · Snap, 0.31 xG0–2
  3. P2 10:46MTLBrendan GallagherAssists: Johnathan Kovacevic, Jordan Harris · Tip-in, 0.13 xG0–3
  4. P2 11:22MTLJuraj SlafkovskýGWGAssists: David Savard · Snap, 0.26 xG0–4
  5. P2 12:42MTLJosh AndersonAssists: Jordan Harris, Tanner Pearson · Backhand, 0.02 xG0–5
  6. P2 15:27MTLChristian DvorakAssists: Jordan Harris · Wrist, 0.13 xG0–6
  7. P3 4:54PHIRyan PoehlingAssists: Owen Tippett, Erik Johnson · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–6
  8. P3 10:06MTLChristian DvorakAssists: Rafael Harvey-Pinard · Snap, 0.23 xG1–7
  9. P3 11:19MTLBrendan GallagherAssists: Joel Armia, Johnathan Kovacevic · Snap, 0.24 xG1–8
  10. P3 15:05PHIJoel FarabeeAssists: Olle Lycksell, Noah Cates · Snap, 0.23 xG2–8
  11. P3 17:07PHIErik JohnsonAssists: Owen Tippett, Garnet Hathaway · Snap, 0.03 xG3–8
  12. P3 18:17MTLJoel ArmiaAssists: Brendan Gallagher, Alex Newhook · Snap, 0.31 xG3–9
Penalties (4)
  1. P1 10:31MTLBrendan Gallagher: Too many men on the ice2 min
  2. P2 17:45MTLJayden Struble: Roughing2 min
  3. P2 17:45PHITravis Konecny: Roughing2 min
  4. P3 5:46MTLAlex Newhook: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MTL
46% to win54% to win
← PHI attackMTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Poehling won the faceoff against Evans
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHIMTL
36Shots on goal30
3.8Expected goals3.5
78Shot attempts68
34Faceoffs won29
2Power plays0
2Penalty minutes6
24Hits16
25Blocked shots17
12Giveaways9
3Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestCates – Lycksell – Farabee4:17

    xG 0.86–0.04 (96%)attempts 7–2goals 1–0

  2. Hathaway – Poehling – Foerster3:03

    xG 0.48–0.20 (70%)attempts 7–4goals 0–1

  3. Couturier – Tippett – Cates2:25

    xG 0.25–0.02 (91%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

  4. Hathaway – Poehling – Lycksell4:17

    xG 0.01–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestStaal – Johnson14:25

    xG 1.17–1.04 (53%)attempts 19–16goals 2–2

  2. Sanheim – York17:57

    xG 1.06–0.93 (53%)attempts 24–20goals 1–1

  3. Seeler – Drysdale14:50

    xG 0.69–1.06 (39%)attempts 14–23goals 0–5

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestGallagher – Armia – Newhook11:46

    xG 1.44–0.42 (78%)attempts 21–12goals 3–0

  2. Pearson – Anderson – Evans10:24

    xG 0.21–0.30 (41%)attempts 15–12goals 1–0

  3. Dvorak – Pezzetta – Harvey-Pinard8:30

    xG 0.40–0.75 (35%)attempts 9–10goals 2–1

  4. Suzuki – Caufield – Slafkovský12:51

    xG 1.09–1.66 (40%)attempts 14–26goals 2–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestStruble – Barron16:39

    xG 1.22–1.05 (54%)attempts 20–25goals 2–0

  2. Savard – Matheson14:56

    xG 1.16–1.16 (50%)attempts 13–19goals 3–1

  3. Kovacevic – Harris16:16

    xG 1.09–1.14 (49%)attempts 27–20goals 4–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MTL 3.5 xGPHI 3.8 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MTLPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MTL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MTL is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 62/100 · #547 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.50 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50MTL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 54% of the time.

MTL winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (MTL − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).