Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Apr 9, 2024·Ball Arena, Denver

Minnesota Wild 2, Colorado Avalanche 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 68% of the time.

COL winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN2120505222
COL2143909532

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:34COLArtturi LehkonenPPAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Cale Makar · Wrist, 0.14 xG0–1
  2. P1 8:38COLNathan MacKinnonAssists: Jonathan Drouin, Cale Makar · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–2
  3. P1 10:14MINKirill KaprizovPPAssists: Mats Zuccarello, Matt Boldy · Wrist, 0.29 xG1–2
  4. P1 19:40MINMatt BoldyPPAssists: Mats Zuccarello, Declan Chisholm · Tip-in, 0.10 xG2–2
  5. P2 6:15COLCale MakarGWGAssists: Devon Toews, Jonathan Drouin · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–3
  6. P2 14:50COLNathan MacKinnonAssists: Jonathan Drouin, Devon Toews · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–4
  7. P2 19:08COLNathan MacKinnonAssists: Artturi Lehkonen · Wrist, 0.18 xG2–5
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 0:42MINKirill Kaprizov: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 4:04MINMason Shaw: Hooking2 min · PPG
  3. P1 9:13COLCasey Mittelstadt: Hooking2 min · PPG
  4. P1 17:52COLChris Wagner: Holding2 min · PPG
  5. P2 2:45MINMatt Boldy: Holding2 min
  6. P2 7:37COLNathan MacKinnon: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  7. P3 0:39COLZach Parise: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 5:10MINMarat Khusnutdinov: Hooking2 min
  9. P3 19:46COLSean Walker: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
46% to win54% to win
← MIN attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Mittelstadt won the faceoff against Eriksson Ek
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINCOL
22Shots on goal32
2.0Expected goals2.9
48Shot attempts54
29Faceoffs won26
5Power plays4
8Penalty minutes10
8Hits14
11Blocked shots15
2Giveaways0
8Takeaways12

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestHartman – Gaudreau – Boldy2:48

    xG 0.19–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  2. Johansson – Eriksson Ek – Boldy8:59

    xG 0.03–0.25 (12%)attempts 2–12goals 0–0

  3. Zuccarello – Kaprizov – Rossi11:29

    xG 0.09–0.32 (22%)attempts 9–5goals 0–2

  4. Hartman – Gaudreau – Kaprizov2:42

    xG 0.03–0.35 (9%)attempts 2–4goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMerrill – Chisholm5:58

    xG 0.19–0.11 (63%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  2. Goligoski – Chisholm4:13

    xG 0.00–0.01 (0%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  3. Brodin – Faber3:22

    xG 0.01–0.15 (4%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestLehkonen – MacKinnon – Drouin11:23

    xG 0.90–0.06 (94%)attempts 14–6goals 4–0

  2. Trenin – Duhaime – Colton8:21

    xG 0.24–0.00 (99%)attempts 16–4goals 0–0

  3. Cogliano – Wagner – Kiviranta4:25

    xG 0.13–0.04 (77%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  4. Parise – Nichushkin – Mittelstadt9:13

    xG 0.11–0.21 (35%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestToews – Makar12:30

    xG 0.54–0.04 (92%)attempts 12–5goals 2–0

  2. Manson – Girard12:02

    xG 0.51–0.06 (90%)attempts 14–4goals 0–0

  3. Girard – Walker2:45

    xG 0.22–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–1goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 2.9 xGMIN 2.0 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 70/100 · #467 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.29 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 68% of the time.

COL winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).