Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Apr 12, 2024·Honda Center, Anaheim

Calgary Flames 6, Anaheim Ducks 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 88% of the time.

ANA winsCGY wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CGY2921028627
ANA0505312322

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:54CGYAndrew MangiapaneSHAssists: Brayden Pachal, Yegor Sharangovich · Wrist, 0.27 xG1–0
  2. P1 11:53CGYNazem KadriAssists: Martin Pospisil, Oliver Kylington · Snap, 0.18 xG2–0
  3. P2 5:43CGYAndrei KuzmenkoPPAssists: Nazem Kadri, MacKenzie Weegar · Tip-in, 0.19 xG3–0
  4. P2 18:28CGYConnor ZaryGWGAssists: Jonathan Huberdeau, Dryden Hunt · Backhand, 0.07 xG4–0
  5. P3 2:54ANASam ColangeloAssists: Isac Lundeström, Radko Gudas · Tip-in, 0.09 xG4–1
  6. P3 6:13ANAFrank VatranoAssists: Trevor Zegras, Jackson LaCombe · Snap, 0.06 xG4–2
  7. P3 7:01ANAOlen ZellwegerAssists: Cam Fowler, Troy Terry · Snap, 0.02 xG4–3
  8. P3 14:22CGYAndrei KuzmenkoPPAssists: Jonathan Huberdeau, Nazem Kadri · Wrist, 0.08 xG5–3
  9. P3 17:19CGYAndrei KuzmenkoAssists: Martin Pospisil, MacKenzie Weegar · Wrist, 0.26 xG6–3
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 4:55CGYJonathan Huberdeau: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 10:08CGYBrayden Pachal: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 10:23ANAJakob Silfverberg: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 5:04ANABo Groulx: Slashing2 min · PPG
  5. P2 5:43ANATrevor Zegras: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min
  6. P2 12:31ANAIsac Lundeström: High sticking2 min
  7. P2 14:09ANAAlex Killorn: Cross checking2 min
  8. P2 14:09CGYRasmus Andersson: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 13:58ANARadko Gudas: High sticking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CGY00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
46% to win54% to win
← CGY attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Lundeström won the faceoff against Kadri
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CGYANA
27Shots on goal22
4.8Expected goals2.0
77Shot attempts48
28Faceoffs won27
5Power plays2
6Penalty minutes12
23Hits21
13Blocked shots24
9Giveaways12
6Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestKadri – Pospisil – Kuzmenko11:18

    xG 1.36–0.34 (80%)attempts 25–11goals 1–0

  2. Huberdeau – Hunt – Zary11:33

    xG 0.55–0.22 (71%)attempts 10–12goals 1–1

  3. Rooney – Duehr – Coronato7:37

    xG 0.13–0.19 (41%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  4. Backlund – Mangiapane – Sharangovich11:07

    xG 0.29–0.60 (32%)attempts 10–10goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestWeegar – Miromanov14:47

    xG 0.89–0.34 (72%)attempts 17–10goals 1–1

  2. Andersson – Kylington17:01

    xG 0.66–0.55 (55%)attempts 17–19goals 0–0

  3. Pachal – Okhotiuk11:47

    xG 0.52–0.45 (54%)attempts 15–10goals 0–1

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestJohnston – Groulx – Leason8:19

    xG 0.38–0.28 (58%)attempts 8–11goals 0–0

  2. Strome – Vatrano – Zegras10:25

    xG 0.51–0.54 (48%)attempts 9–10goals 1–0

  3. Silfverberg – Lundeström – Colangelo9:41

    xG 0.32–0.57 (36%)attempts 10–11goals 1–0

  4. Killorn – Terry – Carlsson11:21

    xG 0.24–0.69 (26%)attempts 10–11goals 1–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestVaakanainen – Lindstrom12:03

    xG 0.51–0.23 (68%)attempts 10–5goals 0–0

  2. Gudas – LaCombe16:45

    xG 0.65–0.91 (41%)attempts 15–22goals 2–0

  3. Fowler – Zellweger14:53

    xG 0.38–1.19 (24%)attempts 15–23goals 1–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 2.0 xGCGY 4.8 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANACGY

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it CGY. Dots are goals.

Excitement 87/100 · #196 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.07 · 8 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
CGY 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 88% of the time.

ANA winsCGY wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − CGY), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).