Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Apr 13, 2024·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

Minnesota Wild 6, San Jose Sharks 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 82% of the time.

SJS winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN213313112638
SJS1911208229

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:19MINMatt BoldyAssists: Kirill Kaprizov, Jake Middleton · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–0
  2. P1 9:32SJSJan RuttaAssists: Mario Ferraro, Mikael Granlund · Slap, 0.07 xG1–1
  3. P1 16:51MINDeclan ChisholmAssists: Jon Merrill, Liam Ohgren · Wrist, 0.02 xG2–1
  4. P2 14:23MINLiam OhgrenGWGAssists: Jonas Brodin, Marat Khusnutdinov · Backhand, 0.14 xG3–1
  5. P2 15:52SJSMario FerraroAssists: William Eklund, Mikael Granlund · Slap, 0.10 xG3–2
  6. P2 19:04MINKirill KaprizovAssists: Brock Faber, Jonas Brodin · Wrist, 0.01 xG4–2
  7. P2 19:51MINKirill KaprizovPPAssists: Joel Eriksson Ek, Matt Boldy · Snap, 0.22 xG5–2
  8. P3 1:46MINMarcus JohanssonAssists: Jon Merrill, Alex Goligoski · Wrist, 0.17 xG6–2
Penalties (5)
  1. P2 1:56SJSThomas Bordeleau: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 3:02MINMarco Rossi: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 5:57MINZach Bogosian: Holding2 min
  4. P2 19:23SJSFabian Zetterlund: High sticking2 min · PPG
  5. P3 9:20MINKirill Kaprizov: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
46% to win54% to win
← MIN attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Eriksson Ek won the faceoff against Granlund
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINSJS
38Shots on goal29
3.5Expected goals1.5
69Shot attempts54
31Faceoffs won34
2Power plays3
6Penalty minutes4
5Hits19
19Blocked shots10
13Giveaways5
8Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestJohansson – Hartman – Rossi9:32

    xG 0.71–0.24 (75%)attempts 9–5goals 1–0

  2. Eriksson Ek – Kaprizov – Boldy10:35

    xG 0.78–0.51 (60%)attempts 20–17goals 2–2

  3. Kaprizov – Boldy – Rossi2:07

    xG 0.14–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  4. Kaprizov – Khusnutdinov – Ohgren4:32

    xG 0.30–0.18 (63%)attempts 5–2goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBogosian – Brodin14:07

    xG 0.73–0.28 (73%)attempts 19–12goals 1–1

  2. Goligoski – Merrill6:35

    xG 0.49–0.09 (85%)attempts 9–3goals 1–0

  3. Middleton – Faber12:06

    xG 0.69–0.38 (65%)attempts 15–8goals 1–0

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestCarpenter – Labanc – Sturm9:29

    xG 0.36–0.12 (75%)attempts 9–5goals 0–1

  2. Bailey – Studnicka – Bordeleau7:47

    xG 0.21–0.19 (53%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  3. Granlund – Zetterlund – Eklund13:58

    xG 0.47–0.78 (38%)attempts 14–23goals 2–1

  4. Kunin – Kostin – Graf11:40

    xG 0.07–0.84 (8%)attempts 10–17goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestVlasic – Addison12:33

    xG 0.31–0.18 (63%)attempts 12–12goals 0–1

  2. Ferraro – Rutta16:02

    xG 0.39–0.93 (29%)attempts 12–22goals 1–2

  3. Burroughs – Thrun16:07

    xG 0.27–1.00 (21%)attempts 11–17goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 1.5 xGMIN 3.5 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 54/100 · #659 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.31 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 82% of the time.

SJS winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).