Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Oct 10, 2024·UBS Arena, Elmont

Utah Hockey Club 5, New York Islanders 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, New York Islanders win this game 51% of the time.

NYI winsUTA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
UTA16192813526
NYI112063900427

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 11:10NYIAnthony DuclairPPAssists: Noah Dobson, Mathew Barzal · Deflected, 0.17 xG0–1
  2. P1 19:01UTALawson CrousePPAssists: Matias Maccelli, Logan Cooley · Snap, 0.16 xG1–1
  3. P2 13:07UTABarrett HaytonAssists: Mikhail Sergachev, Clayton Keller · Tip-in, 0.10 xG2–1
  4. P3 1:03NYIBo HorvatAssists: Anthony Duclair, Noah Dobson · Slap, 0.23 xG2–2
  5. P3 6:52NYIJean-Gabriel PageauSHAssists: Simon Holmstrom · Backhand, 0.21 xG2–3
  6. P3 7:37UTADylan GuentherPPAssists: Clayton Keller, Mikhail Sergachev · Snap, 0.09 xG3–3
  7. P3 17:53NYIMaxim TsyplakovAssists: Brock Nelson, Kyle Palmieri · Snap, 0.13 xG3–4
  8. P3 18:06UTAJosh DoanAssists: Alexander Kerfoot, Lawson Crouse · Backhand, 0.08 xG4–4
  9. OT 2:18UTADylan GuentherGWGAssists: Sean Durzi, Logan Cooley · Snap, 0.20 xG5–4
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 10:14UTALogan Cooley: High sticking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 11:10UTAMichael Carcone: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min
  3. P1 15:10UTASean Durzi: Holding2 min
  4. P1 18:17NYIAlexander Romanov: Interference2 min · PPG
  5. P2 14:41UTAMichael Kesselring: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 6:41NYIKyle Palmieri: Tripping2 min · PPG
  7. P3 9:22UTAIan Cole: High sticking double minor4 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

UTA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NYI
43% to win57% to win
← UTA attackNYI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Horvat won the faceoff against Hayton
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

UTANYI
26Shots on goal27
3.2Expected goals3.2
58Shot attempts64
36Faceoffs won33
2Power plays6
12Penalty minutes4
13Hits24
20Blocked shots20
20Giveaways11
11Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Utah Hockey Club

Forward lines

  1. bestSchmaltz – Keller – Hayton13:47

    xG 1.14–0.42 (73%)attempts 19–10goals 1–1

  2. Kerfoot – Crouse – Doan8:33

    xG 0.25–0.00 (100%)attempts 11–4goals 1–0

  3. Stenlund – Carcone – Maccelli10:07

    xG 0.38–0.36 (51%)attempts 10–11goals 0–0

  4. McBain – Guenther – Cooley7:30

    xG 0.13–0.45 (23%)attempts 8–12goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSergachev – Durzi14:14

    xG 1.03–0.20 (83%)attempts 15–10goals 1–1

  2. Välimäki – Kesselring9:37

    xG 0.40–0.13 (75%)attempts 9–3goals 1–0

  3. Välimäki – Kolyachonok2:14

    xG 0.15–0.08 (65%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

New York Islanders

Forward lines

  1. Duclair – Horvat – Barzal11:14

    xG 0.37–0.39 (49%)attempts 10–12goals 1–0

  2. Palmieri – Nelson – Tsyplakov11:04

    xG 0.64–0.65 (49%)attempts 12–16goals 1–0

  3. Lee – Pageau – Holmstrom8:15

    xG 0.03–0.16 (15%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

  4. Cizikas – Wahlstrom – MacLean9:20

    xG 0.07–0.77 (9%)attempts 6–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestDobson – Romanov13:28

    xG 0.71–0.54 (57%)attempts 19–18goals 1–1

  2. Reilly – Mayfield9:45

    xG 0.33–0.47 (42%)attempts 11–5goals 1–0

  3. Pelech – Pulock14:56

    xG 0.23–0.52 (31%)attempts 8–17goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NYI 3.2 xGUTA 3.2 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NYIUTA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NYI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NYI is favoured, below it UTA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 98/100 · #31 of 1312 this seasonSwing 3.02 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 6% (winner's lowest chance)
UTA 100%5050%50NYI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +39 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, New York Islanders win this game 51% of the time.

NYI winsUTA wins

Simulated goal difference (NYI − UTA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).