Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Oct 11, 2024·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

Philadelphia Flyers 3, Vancouver Canucks 2 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 53% of the time.

VAN winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
PHI11006113022331
VAN1121508011226

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:55VANNils HoglanderAssists: Conor Garland · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–1
  2. P1 17:24PHITyson FoersterPPAssists: Joel Farabee, Bobby Brink · Wrist, 0.22 xG1–1
  3. P2 11:25VANTeddy BluegerAssists: Derek Forbort, Pius Suter · Tip-in, 0.11 xG1–2
  4. P3 2:48PHICam YorkAssists: Ryan Poehling, Garnet Hathaway · Wrist, 0.30 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. VAN J.T. Miller stopped
  2. 2. PHI Sean Couturier stopped
  3. 3. VAN Elias Pettersson stopped
  4. 4. PHI Matvei Michkov stopped
  5. 5. VAN Jake DeBrusk scored
  6. 6. PHI Travis Konecny scored
  7. 7. VAN Conor Garland stopped
  8. 8. PHI Tyson Foerster stopped
  9. 9. VAN Brock Boeser stopped
  10. 10. PHI Morgan Frost scored
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 2:43PHIScott Laughton: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 5:05PHIMatvei Michkov: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 15:31VANNils Hoglander: Holding2 min · PPG
  4. P2 5:18VANFilip Hronek: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 8:24PHIJoel Farabee: Too many men on the ice2 min
  6. P3 6:15VANCarson Soucy: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  7. P3 8:29PHICam York: Cross checking2 min
  8. P3 12:00VANNils Hoglander: Holding2 min
  9. P3 13:30PHIMorgan Frost: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
43% to win57% to win
← PHI attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Couturier won the faceoff against Miller
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHIVAN
31Shots on goal26
3.1Expected goals2.9
51Shot attempts70
27Faceoffs won37
4Power plays5
10Penalty minutes8
21Hits29
20Blocked shots12
16Giveaways11
7Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestLaughton – Hathaway – Poehling6:52

    xG 0.38–0.25 (60%)attempts 8–10goals 1–1

  2. Tippett – Frost – Foerster5:35

    xG 0.18–0.10 (64%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

  3. Konecny – Frost – Michkov4:46

    xG 0.16–0.12 (57%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  4. Couturier – Farabee – Brink2:34

    xG 0.04–0.12 (26%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Sanheim – York13:05

    xG 0.51–0.57 (47%)attempts 8–11goals 1–0

  2. Ristolainen – Zamula11:06

    xG 0.17–0.33 (34%)attempts 13–12goals 0–1

  3. Johnson – Drysdale10:35

    xG 0.08–0.40 (16%)attempts 5–17goals 0–0

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestBlueger – Suter – Sherwood8:25

    xG 0.56–0.24 (70%)attempts 10–7goals 1–0

  2. DeBrusk – Garland – Pettersson3:17

    xG 0.15–0.02 (87%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  3. Miller – Heinen – Boeser8:46

    xG 0.16–0.07 (68%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0

  4. Garland – Hoglander – Räty7:24

    xG 0.13–0.21 (40%)attempts 11–7goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSoucy – Hughes2:08

    xG 0.30–0.02 (94%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  2. Hronek – Hughes11:14

    xG 0.29–0.06 (84%)attempts 14–4goals 0–0

  3. Forbort – Juulsen4:05

    xG 0.15–0.04 (81%)attempts 7–3goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 2.9 xGPHI 3.1 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 74/100 · #331 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.03 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 20% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +24 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 53% of the time.

VAN winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).