Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 12, 2024·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Seattle Kraken 5, Minnesota Wild 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 53% of the time.

MIN winsSEA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
SEA010212210022534
MIN11419213021438

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:22MINMats ZuccarelloAssists: Kirill Kaprizov, Marco Rossi · Snap, 0.23 xG0–1
  2. P2 1:06MINMatt BoldyPPAssists: Kirill Kaprizov, Mats Zuccarello · Wrist, 0.09 xG0–2
  3. P2 1:46SEAJordan EberleAssists: Jared McCann, Brandon Montour · Poke, 0.09 xG1–2
  4. P2 8:15SEAJordan EberlePPAssists: Andre Burakovsky, Vince Dunn · Wrist, 0.30 xG2–2
  5. P3 1:41MINKirill KaprizovAssists: Marco Rossi, Brock Faber · Tip-in, 0.09 xG2–3
  6. P3 2:47SEATye KartyeAssists: Brandon Tanev, Yanni Gourde · Snap, 0.09 xG3–3
  7. P3 12:33MINRyan HartmanAssists: Matt Boldy, Jared Spurgeon · Wrist, 0.12 xG3–4
  8. P3 16:34SEAJared McCannAssists: Ryker Evans, Andre Burakovsky · Slap, 0.04 xG4–4

Shootout

  1. 1. MIN Mats Zuccarello scored
  2. 2. SEA Oliver Bjorkstrand scored
  3. 3. MIN Kirill Kaprizov stopped
  4. 4. SEA Jordan Eberle scored
  5. 5. MIN Matt Boldy stopped
Penalties (4)
  1. P1 15:18SEABrandon Tanev: Boarding2 min
  2. P1 19:46SEAJaden Schwartz: Tripping2 min · PPG
  3. P2 7:15MINJonas Brodin: Tripping2 min · PPG
  4. P2 17:50MINZach Bogosian: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SEA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
43% to win57% to win
← SEA attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Gourde won the faceoff against Hartman
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SEAMIN
34Shots on goal38
2.7Expected goals2.9
56Shot attempts63
32Faceoffs won33
2Power plays2
4Penalty minutes4
21Hits38
15Blocked shots8
11Giveaways11
6Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. Bjorkstrand – Tolvanen – Beniers11:42

    xG 0.09–0.11 (46%)attempts 9–12goals 0–0

  2. Gourde – Tanev – Kartye8:38

    xG 0.34–0.37 (48%)attempts 9–8goals 1–1

  3. Eberle – McCann – Wright10:40

    xG 0.44–0.53 (46%)attempts 11–12goals 1–1

  4. Schwartz – Stephenson – Burakovsky11:32

    xG 0.30–0.40 (43%)attempts 8–10goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMontour – Dunn2:56

    xG 0.16–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–2goals 1–0

  2. Oleksiak – Montour16:27

    xG 0.29–0.34 (46%)attempts 14–15goals 1–0

  3. Borgen – Evans13:52

    xG 0.31–0.38 (44%)attempts 8–13goals 0–1

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestZuccarello – Kaprizov – Rossi10:58

    xG 0.73–0.01 (98%)attempts 15–4goals 2–0

  2. Johansson – Hartman – Boldy3:32

    xG 0.13–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 1–0

  3. Foligno – Trenin – Khusnutdinov2:23

    xG 0.00–0.03 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–0

  4. Foligno – Hartman – Trenin7:17

    xG 0.14–0.21 (39%)attempts 11–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrodin – Faber20:35

    xG 0.81–0.33 (71%)attempts 19–14goals 1–0

  2. Spurgeon – Middleton15:52

    xG 0.51–0.50 (51%)attempts 14–16goals 1–2

  3. Bogosian – Merrill12:03

    xG 0.23–0.36 (39%)attempts 13–9goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.9 xGSEA 2.7 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINSEA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it SEA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 95/100 · #60 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.53 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 9% (winner's lowest chance)
SEA 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +37 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 53% of the time.

MIN winsSEA wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − SEA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).