Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 12, 2024·Rogers Place, Edmonton

Chicago Blackhawks 5, Edmonton Oilers 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 79% of the time.

EDM winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI1102723520
EDM010114114238

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 15:50CHIPhilipp KurashevAssists: Taylor Hall, Wyatt Kaiser · Tip-in, 0.07 xG1–0
  2. P2 4:55EDMCorey PerryAssists: Jeff Skinner, Mattias Ekholm · Backhand, 0.19 xG1–1
  3. P2 10:19CHISeth JonesPPAssists: Connor Bedard, Teuvo Teravainen · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–1
  4. P2 13:58CHIConnor BedardGWGAssists: Teuvo Teravainen, TJ Brodie · Snap, 0.09 xG3–1
  5. P3 5:35CHITeuvo TeravainenPPAssists: Seth Jones, Connor Bedard · Snap, 0.05 xG4–1
  6. P3 10:01EDMLeon DraisaitlPPAssists: Connor McDavid, Ryan Nugent-Hopkins · Wrist, 0.12 xG4–2
  7. P3 19:13CHITeuvo TeravainenPPAssists: Alex Vlasic, Seth Jones · Slap, 0.05 xG5–2
Penalties (6)
  1. P2 2:50CHIConnor Murphy: Hooking2 min
  2. P2 9:05EDMMattias Janmark: Hooking2 min · PPG
  3. P3 2:55CHIRyan Donato: Tripping2 min
  4. P3 5:25EDMConnor McDavid: Roughing2 min · PPG
  5. P3 9:16CHISeth Jones: Interference2 min · PPG
  6. P3 18:55EDMLeon Draisaitl: Hooking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
43% to win57% to win
← CHI attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Draisaitl won the faceoff against Bedard
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHIEDM
20Shots on goal38
1.9Expected goals3.6
37Shot attempts96
25Faceoffs won38
3Power plays3
6Penalty minutes6
16Hits9
35Blocked shots12
11Giveaways9
9Takeaways13

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestDickinson – Anderson – Mikheyev9:22

    xG 0.33–0.12 (73%)attempts 6–11goals 0–0

  2. Foligno – Teravainen – Bedard13:12

    xG 0.39–0.58 (40%)attempts 12–21goals 1–0

  3. Hall – Bertuzzi – Kurashev10:47

    xG 0.27–0.55 (33%)attempts 8–20goals 1–0

  4. Maroon – Athanasiou – Donato9:03

    xG 0.06–0.65 (8%)attempts 1–16goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJones – Vlasic5:34

    xG 0.22–0.17 (57%)attempts 8–9goals 0–0

  2. Murphy – Kaiser13:30

    xG 0.44–0.70 (39%)attempts 10–25goals 1–0

  3. Martinez – Jones12:01

    xG 0.21–0.49 (29%)attempts 8–21goals 1–0

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestPerry – Ryan – Podkolzin3:56

    xG 0.47–0.00 (100%)attempts 9–0goals 0–0

  2. Hyman – Nugent-Hopkins – McDavid12:11

    xG 0.71–0.32 (69%)attempts 18–10goals 0–0

  3. Henrique – Brown – Janmark6:17

    xG 0.24–0.07 (76%)attempts 9–4goals 0–1

  4. Skinner – Draisaitl – Arvidsson10:37

    xG 0.35–0.20 (64%)attempts 16–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKulak – Emberson13:35

    xG 1.18–0.22 (84%)attempts 31–5goals 0–2

  2. Nurse – Dermott14:22

    xG 0.24–0.14 (63%)attempts 13–10goals 0–0

  3. Ekholm – Bouchard17:26

    xG 0.63–0.58 (52%)attempts 28–13goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 3.6 xGCHI 1.9 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 53/100 · #608 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.17 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 43% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 79% of the time.

EDM winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).