Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Oct 15, 2024·Rogers Place, Edmonton

Philadelphia Flyers 3, Edmonton Oilers 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 56% of the time.

EDM winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
PHI2121100800330
EDM0721111211431

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:46PHIMatvei MichkovPPAssists: Owen Tippett, Morgan Frost · Backhand, 0.06 xG1–0
  2. P1 9:21PHIMatvei MichkovPPAssists: Morgan Frost, Travis Konecny · Snap, 0.03 xG2–0
  3. P2 6:26EDMAdam HenriqueAssists: Mattias Janmark, Brett Kulak · Backhand, 0.06 xG2–1
  4. P2 14:01EDMConnor BrownAssists: Jeff Skinner, Darnell Nurse · Snap, 0.13 xG2–2
  5. P2 19:37PHIBobby BrinkAssists: Egor Zamula, Joel Farabee · Wrist, 0.01 xG3–2
  6. P3 16:18EDMEvan BouchardAssists: Connor McDavid, Leon Draisaitl · Wrist, 0.10 xG3–3
  7. OT 0:56EDMLeon DraisaitlGWGAssists: Connor McDavid · Snap, 0.28 xG3–4
Penalties (15)
  1. P1 4:02EDMZach Hyman: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  2. P1 4:46EDMZach Hyman: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min
  3. P1 7:38EDMCorey Perry: Slashing2 min · PPG
  4. P1 10:50PHIBobby Brink: High sticking2 min
  5. P1 16:50EDMZach Hyman: Elbowing2 min
  6. P2 3:01PHIJett Luchanko: High sticking2 min
  7. P2 9:42PHITravis Konecny: Slashing2 min
  8. P2 16:08EDMBrett Kulak: High sticking2 min
  9. P2 17:28EDMEvan Bouchard: Holding2 min
  10. P2 19:52EDMLeon Draisaitl: Cross checking2 min
  11. P3 7:56PHITravis Sanheim: Hooking2 min
  12. P3 10:02PHISean Couturier: Fighting5 min
  13. P3 10:02EDMTroy Stecher: Fighting5 min
  14. P3 10:04PHIJoel Farabee: Fighting5 min
  15. P3 10:04EDMCorey Perry: Fighting5 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
43% to win57% to win
← PHI attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00McDavid won the faceoff against Luchanko
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHIEDM
30Shots on goal31
3.0Expected goals3.4
53Shot attempts67
27Faceoffs won39
7Power plays4
18Penalty minutes24
21Hits23
21Blocked shots9
9Giveaways12
7Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestTippett – Frost – Michkov3:56

    xG 0.28–0.02 (94%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

  2. Konecny – Foerster – Luchanko9:18

    xG 0.22–0.33 (40%)attempts 5–9goals 0–0

  3. Laughton – Hathaway – Poehling7:12

    xG 0.29–0.68 (30%)attempts 4–12goals 0–1

  4. Couturier – Farabee – Brink4:36

    xG 0.05–0.44 (10%)attempts 3–7goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestJohnson – Drysdale5:43

    xG 0.67–0.48 (58%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0

  2. Ristolainen – Zamula11:00

    xG 0.39–0.28 (58%)attempts 11–11goals 0–1

  3. Johnson – Ristolainen3:01

    xG 0.01–0.10 (7%)attempts 1–7goals 0–0

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestHenrique – Skinner – Brown4:26

    xG 0.67–0.20 (77%)attempts 8–6goals 1–0

  2. Hyman – Draisaitl – McDavid11:55

    xG 0.62–0.46 (57%)attempts 9–7goals 1–0

  3. Nugent-Hopkins – Arvidsson – Podkolzin5:36

    xG 0.15–0.14 (51%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

  4. Perry – Janmark – Ryan2:26

    xG 0.11–0.25 (31%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKulak – Bouchard2:41

    xG 0.33–0.11 (75%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  2. Nurse – Stecher9:10

    xG 0.67–0.46 (59%)attempts 11–11goals 1–0

  3. Ekholm – Bouchard12:26

    xG 0.41–0.40 (50%)attempts 17–6goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 3.4 xGPHI 3.0 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 95/100 · #76 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.57 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 12% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +43 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 56% of the time.

EDM winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).