Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Oct 29, 2024·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Minnesota Wild 5, Pittsburgh Penguins 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 66% of the time.

PIT winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN216210114540
PIT2901119329

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 11:36PITValtteri PuustinenPPAssists: Matt Grzelcyk, Sidney Crosby · Snap, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P1 15:31PITRickard RakellAssists: Kris Letang, Sidney Crosby · Snap, 0.16 xG0–2
  3. P1 17:03MINJakub LaukoAssists: Marat Khusnutdinov · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–2
  4. P1 17:58MINFrederick GaudreauUnassisted · Wrist, 0.12 xG2–2
  5. P2 1:38MINFrederick GaudreauAssists: Kirill Kaprizov, Brock Faber · Wrist, 0.14 xG3–2
  6. P2 19:23MINMats ZuccarelloGWGAssists: Kirill Kaprizov, Marco Rossi · Tip-in, 0.10 xG4–2
  7. P3 3:36PITRickard RakellAssists: Marcus Pettersson, Sidney Crosby · Wrist, 0.26 xG4–3
  8. P3 19:41MINKirill KaprizovENAssists: Frederick Gaudreau, Jake Middleton · Wrist, 0.33 xG5–3
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 7:24MINJon Merrill: Cross checking2 min
  2. P1 10:10MINMarco Rossi: High sticking2 min · PPG
  3. P1 19:12PITLars Eller: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 10:39PITJack St. Ivany: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 10:39MINBrock Faber: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 10:39PITJack St. Ivany: Fighting5 min
  7. P3 9:38PITAnthony Beauvillier: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 11:13PITKevin Hayes: Tripping2 min
  9. P3 12:17PITLars Eller: Delaying game puck over glass2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
43% to win57% to win
← MIN attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Eriksson Ek
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINPIT
40Shots on goal29
3.3Expected goals2.3
68Shot attempts53
25Faceoffs won35
5Power plays2
9Penalty minutes15
15Hits15
16Blocked shots11
13Giveaways17
4Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestJohansson – Eriksson Ek – Boldy10:46

    xG 0.67–0.24 (74%)attempts 11–13goals 0–0

  2. Zuccarello – Kaprizov – Rossi12:51

    xG 0.66–0.80 (45%)attempts 18–10goals 1–1

  3. Lauko – Khusnutdinov – Ohgren5:57

    xG 0.12–0.37 (24%)attempts 6–7goals 1–0

  4. Foligno – Gaudreau – Trenin10:14

    xG 0.31–0.59 (35%)attempts 9–12goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMiddleton – Faber13:45

    xG 0.97–0.76 (56%)attempts 18–16goals 2–2

  2. Spurgeon – Brodin15:13

    xG 0.32–0.15 (68%)attempts 13–9goals 1–0

  3. Bogosian – Merrill11:14

    xG 0.50–0.38 (57%)attempts 14–12goals 0–0

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. Malkin – Crosby – Rakell14:09

    xG 0.74–0.69 (52%)attempts 18–11goals 2–0

  2. Bunting – Glass – Puustinen2:13

    xG 0.00–0.04 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–1

  3. Bunting – Beauvillier – Glass3:00

    xG 0.02–0.08 (20%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  4. Eller – Puustinen – O'Connor5:25

    xG 0.05–0.17 (22%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLetang – Pettersson3:00

    xG 0.23–0.10 (70%)attempts 4–3goals 1–1

  2. Pettersson – St. Ivany2:33

    xG 0.10–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  3. Letang – Grzelcyk13:20

    xG 0.52–0.46 (53%)attempts 20–13goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 2.3 xGMIN 3.3 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 79/100 · #271 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.64 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 17% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 66% of the time.

PIT winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).