Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Nov 5, 2024·Lenovo Center, Raleigh

Philadelphia Flyers 4, Carolina Hurricanes 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 84% of the time.

CAR winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI1101323416
CAR18213314635

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:54PHITravis KonecnyPPAssists: Owen Tippett, Matvei Michkov · Wrist, 0.26 xG1–0
  2. P1 14:25CARJackson BlakeAssists: Jack Drury, Dmitry Orlov · Snap, 0.26 xG1–1
  3. P2 8:56CAREric RobinsonAssists: Martin Necas, Brent Burns · Snap, 0.12 xG1–2
  4. P2 9:50CARJordan MartinookAssists: Jaccob Slavin, Brent Burns · Backhand, 0.14 xG1–3
  5. P2 13:30PHIOwen TippettAssists: Travis Konecny, Sean Couturier · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–3
  6. P3 1:18PHIMorgan FrostAssists: Travis Sanheim, Travis Konecny · Deflected, 0.08 xG3–3
  7. P3 1:47CARJack RoslovicAssists: Andrei Svechnikov, Sebastian Aho · Snap, 0.36 xG3–4
  8. P3 9:17PHITravis KonecnyAssists: Sean Couturier · Tip-in, 0.07 xG4–4
  9. P3 19:29CARMartin NecasGWGUnassisted · Snap, 0.10 xG4–5
  10. P3 19:58CARSeth JarvisENUnassisted · Snap, 0.54 xG4–6
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 6:15CARAndrei Svechnikov: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 7:08CARJordan Staal: High sticking2 min
  3. P2 16:06PHISean Couturier: Tripping2 min
  4. P3 13:41CARWilliam Carrier: Tripping2 min
  5. P3 13:58PHIEmil Andrae: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CAR
43% to win57% to win
← PHI attackCAR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Couturier won the faceoff against Staal
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHICAR
16Shots on goal35
2.3Expected goals4.7
36Shot attempts86
33Faceoffs won23
3Power plays2
4Penalty minutes6
18Hits13
20Blocked shots9
14Giveaways5
12Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestDeslauriers – Hathaway – Cates5:59

    xG 0.35–0.01 (96%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

  2. Konecny – Tippett – Frost2:44

    xG 0.25–0.02 (94%)attempts 4–4goals 1–0

  3. Frost – Foerster – Michkov2:54

    xG 0.07–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  4. Couturier – Foerster – Michkov3:44

    xG 0.16–0.16 (50%)attempts 1–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Sanheim – Drysdale16:05

    xG 0.33–0.39 (46%)attempts 7–19goals 0–0

  2. Zamula – Andrae8:29

    xG 0.59–0.70 (46%)attempts 10–10goals 0–2

  3. Ristolainen – Drysdale2:09

    xG 0.00–0.21 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

Carolina Hurricanes

Forward lines

  1. bestStaal – Martinook – Jarvis13:12

    xG 1.20–0.37 (77%)attempts 27–5goals 1–0

  2. Necas – Robinson – Kotkaniemi11:30

    xG 0.86–0.51 (63%)attempts 18–8goals 2–2

  3. Aho – Roslovic – Svechnikov10:50

    xG 0.79–0.53 (60%)attempts 11–10goals 1–1

  4. Carrier – Drury – Blake7:54

    xG 0.32–0.32 (50%)attempts 7–7goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestOrlov – Chatfield16:19

    xG 1.80–0.67 (73%)attempts 25–10goals 3–2

  2. Burns – Slavin17:50

    xG 1.28–0.45 (74%)attempts 33–10goals 2–1

  3. Gostisbehere – Walker14:02

    xG 0.30–0.67 (31%)attempts 10–10goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CAR 4.7 xGPHI 2.3 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CARPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CAR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CAR is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 95/100 · #70 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.20 · 10 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 39% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50CAR 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +43 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 84% of the time.

CAR winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (CAR − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).