Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Nov 11, 2024·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

San Jose Sharks 3, Philadelphia Flyers 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 69% of the time.

PHI winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
SJS0112817050331
PHI211114016022443

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:40PHIErik JohnsonAssists: Anthony Richard · Wrist, 0.07 xG0–1
  2. P1 15:56PHITravis KonecnyPPAssists: Matvei Michkov, Emil Andrae · Snap, 0.14 xG0–2
  3. P2 5:09PHIMatvei MichkovAssists: Ryan Poehling, Egor Zamula · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–3
  4. P2 15:29SJSJack ThompsonAssists: William Eklund, Mikael Granlund · Deflected, 0.09 xG1–3
  5. P2 18:33SJSMikael GranlundAssists: William Eklund, Fabian Zetterlund · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–3
  6. P3 17:36SJSBarclay GoodrowAssists: Henry Thrun, Cody Ceci · Snap, 0.12 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. PHI Owen Tippett stopped
  2. 2. SJS Macklin Celebrini stopped
  3. 3. PHI Matvei Michkov scored
  4. 4. SJS Will Smith stopped
  5. 5. PHI Travis Konecny scored
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 1:43PHIErik Johnson: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 1:43SJSGivani Smith: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 9:04PHIJoel Farabee: Too many men on the ice2 min
  4. P1 12:08SJSTy Dellandrea: Holding2 min
  5. P1 15:27SJSMikael Granlund: Holding the stick2 min · PPG
  6. P2 12:09SJSBarclay Goodrow: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 12:09PHINick Seeler: Fighting5 min
  8. P3 3:55SJSJan Rutta: Hooking2 min
  9. P3 9:22PHIBobby Brink: Tripping2 min
  10. P3 0:00PHIMatvei Michkov: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
43% to win57% to win
← SJS attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Celebrini won the faceoff against Couturier
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSPHI
31Shots on goal43
2.5Expected goals3.7
50Shot attempts80
31Faceoffs won31
3Power plays3
16Penalty minutes16
21Hits23
19Blocked shots10
15Giveaways14
2Takeaways12

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. Granlund – Zetterlund – Eklund12:20

    xG 0.40–0.44 (47%)attempts 13–13goals 2–0

  2. Toffoli – Dellandrea – Celebrini10:59

    xG 0.65–0.73 (47%)attempts 9–12goals 0–0

  3. Goodrow – Wennberg – Smith5:39

    xG 0.14–0.37 (27%)attempts 5–5goals 0–2

  4. Kunin – Smith – Sturm3:46

    xG 0.00–0.38 (0%)attempts 0–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestRutta – Thompson5:08

    xG 0.35–0.09 (80%)attempts 7–3goals 0–1

  2. Rutta – Thrun2:03

    xG 0.00–0.02 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

  3. Ferraro – Rutta4:35

    xG 0.04–0.07 (35%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestCouturier – Konecny – Tippett12:17

    xG 0.91–0.31 (75%)attempts 23–11goals 0–0

  2. Richard – Poehling – Michkov7:41

    xG 0.49–0.21 (70%)attempts 11–7goals 2–0

  3. Hathaway – Cates – Foerster6:54

    xG 0.45–0.20 (70%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0

  4. Laughton – Farabee – Brink9:33

    xG 0.27–0.63 (30%)attempts 8–10goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSanheim – Andrae18:08

    xG 1.37–0.51 (73%)attempts 30–9goals 0–0

  2. Seeler – Ristolainen12:26

    xG 0.68–0.30 (70%)attempts 17–11goals 0–1

  3. Johnson – Zamula7:36

    xG 0.33–0.09 (78%)attempts 7–2goals 2–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 3.7 xGSJS 2.5 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHISJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 86/100 · #183 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.78 · 6 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +38 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 69% of the time.

PHI winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).