Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 16, 2024·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Buffalo Sabres 2, Philadelphia Flyers 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 78% of the time.

PHI winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF0801126225
PHI21021418532

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 13:57PHITyson FoersterPPAssists: Anthony Richard, Joel Farabee · Poke, 0.22 xG0–1
  2. P1 16:01PHITravis SanheimAssists: Egor Zamula, Travis Konecny · Snap, 0.04 xG0–2
  3. P2 2:08PHIEgor ZamulaGWGAssists: Anthony Richard, Matvei Michkov · Wrist, 0.01 xG0–3
  4. P2 17:07PHITravis KonecnyAssists: Matvei Michkov, Travis Sanheim · Snap, 0.19 xG0–4
  5. P3 10:06BUFRasmus DahlinPPAssists: Alex Tuch, Jason Zucker · Slap, 0.04 xG1–4
  6. P3 18:55BUFRyan McLeodAssists: JJ Peterka, Rasmus Dahlin · Wrist, 0.24 xG2–4
  7. P3 19:42PHITravis KonecnyENAssists: Sean Couturier · Wrist, 0.82 xG2–5
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 6:44BUFConnor Clifton: Cross checking2 min
  2. P1 12:58BUFZach Benson: Slashing2 min · PPG
  3. P2 10:39PHITravis Konecny: Slashing2 min
  4. P2 10:53BUFRasmus Dahlin: Interference2 min
  5. P2 15:22PHIEmil Andrae: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 16:24BUFRasmus Dahlin: Slashing2 min
  7. P2 17:07BUFZach Benson: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 17:07PHITravis Konecny: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 9:57PHITravis Sanheim: Holding2 min · PPG
  10. P3 10:26BUFNicolas Aube-Kubel: Tripping2 min
  11. P3 13:03PHIRasmus Ristolainen: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
43% to win57% to win
← BUF attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00McLeod won the faceoff against Couturier
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFPHI
25Shots on goal32
1.9Expected goals3.5
63Shot attempts54
38Faceoffs won39
4Power plays5
12Penalty minutes10
13Hits14
12Blocked shots25
18Giveaways17
5Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestZucker – Krebs – Kulich9:20

    xG 0.42–0.11 (79%)attempts 12–6goals 0–0

  2. Aube-Kubel – Lafferty – Malenstyn8:03

    xG 0.14–0.12 (55%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

  3. Cozens – Quinn – Benson8:08

    xG 0.32–0.46 (41%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0

  4. Tuch – McLeod – Peterka9:10

    xG 0.25–0.40 (39%)attempts 6–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBryson – Power12:06

    xG 0.35–0.15 (70%)attempts 14–5goals 0–0

  2. Dahlin – Byram12:59

    xG 0.72–0.74 (49%)attempts 17–18goals 0–1

  3. Clifton – Gilbert8:04

    xG 0.12–0.15 (45%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestCouturier – Konecny – Tippett7:20

    xG 0.45–0.11 (81%)attempts 10–7goals 0–0

  2. Hathaway – Poehling – Foerster5:20

    xG 0.32–0.12 (72%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  3. Laughton – Farabee – Brink6:14

    xG 0.02–0.13 (11%)attempts 1–8goals 0–0

  4. Richard – Cates – Michkov7:46

    xG 0.25–0.52 (33%)attempts 7–13goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSanheim – Andrae11:34

    xG 0.85–0.37 (70%)attempts 14–14goals 0–0

  2. Ristolainen – Sanheim2:56

    xG 0.16–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  3. Sanheim – Zamula2:12

    xG 0.05–0.14 (28%)attempts 2–3goals 2–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 3.5 xGBUF 1.9 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHIBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 62/100 · #497 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.54 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 56% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +12 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 78% of the time.

PHI winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).