Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Nov 27, 2024·Climate Pledge Arena, Seattle

Anaheim Ducks 5, Seattle Kraken 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 69% of the time.

SEA winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA21328112533
SEA115110019244

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:23ANAFrank VatranoAssists: Troy Terry · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–0
  2. P1 12:43ANABrett LeasonAssists: Cutter Gauthier, Isac Lundeström · Wrist, 0.02 xG2–0
  3. P1 16:34SEAEeli TolvanenAssists: Yanni Gourde, Brandon Tanev · Snap, 0.13 xG2–1
  4. P2 8:58SEAOliver BjorkstrandAssists: Shane Wright · Snap, 0.07 xG2–2
  5. P2 10:02ANAAlex KillornGWGAssists: Trevor Zegras · Wrist, 0.11 xG3–2
  6. P2 19:23ANACutter GauthierPPAssists: Pavel Mintyukov · Wrist, 0.06 xG4–2
  7. P3 13:55ANATrevor ZegrasAssists: Alex Killorn, Mason McTavish · Wrist, 0.09 xG5–2
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 13:16ANARoss Johnston: Interference2 min
  2. P2 1:12ANABrett Leason: Holding2 min
  3. P2 17:31SEAMatty Beniers: High sticking2 min · PPG
  4. P3 1:17SEAJamie Oleksiak: Tripping2 min
  5. P3 10:36ANARadko Gudas: Holding the stick2 min
  6. P3 15:00ANAJansen Harkins: Cross checking2 min
  7. P3 15:00SEATye Kartye: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 15:00ANARoss Johnston: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 15:00ANARoss Johnston: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 15:00ANARoss Johnston: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SEA
43% to win57% to win
← ANA attackSEA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Beniers won the faceoff against McTavish
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANASEA
33Shots on goal44
3.9Expected goals5.2
65Shot attempts84
27Faceoffs won44
2Power plays5
22Penalty minutes6
34Hits21
16Blocked shots17
17Giveaways13
3Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestJohnston – Harkins – Colangelo8:50

    xG 0.37–0.23 (62%)attempts 10–8goals 0–0

  2. Strome – Vatrano – Terry10:18

    xG 0.55–0.65 (46%)attempts 10–13goals 1–1

  3. Lundeström – Leason – Gauthier8:51

    xG 0.14–0.39 (26%)attempts 9–10goals 1–0

  4. Killorn – Zegras – McTavish9:22

    xG 0.45–0.89 (34%)attempts 14–13goals 2–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestLaCombe – Zellweger11:24

    xG 0.86–0.34 (72%)attempts 20–9goals 1–1

  2. Gudas – Mintyukov15:23

    xG 0.47–0.77 (38%)attempts 12–16goals 1–0

  3. Dumoulin – Helleson14:29

    xG 0.56–1.12 (33%)attempts 14–21goals 1–0

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. bestBurakovsky – McCann – Beniers10:00

    xG 0.73–0.19 (80%)attempts 11–9goals 0–0

  2. Bjorkstrand – Tolvanen – Wright7:06

    xG 0.47–0.07 (87%)attempts 10–5goals 1–0

  3. Schwartz – Stephenson – Sprong4:48

    xG 0.41–0.29 (58%)attempts 4–6goals 0–2

  4. Schwartz – Stephenson – Bjorkstrand3:00

    xG 0.09–0.13 (41%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLarsson – Evans14:02

    xG 0.98–0.70 (58%)attempts 20–16goals 1–1

  2. Borgen – Mahura9:33

    xG 0.31–0.24 (56%)attempts 8–16goals 0–1

  3. Oleksiak – Montour14:29

    xG 0.87–0.88 (50%)attempts 15–19goals 1–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SEA 5.2 xGANA 3.9 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SEAANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SEA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SEA is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 71/100 · #376 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.45 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 43% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50SEA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +24 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 69% of the time.

SEA winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (SEA − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).