Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 30, 2024·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Calgary Flames 2, Pittsburgh Penguins 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 78% of the time.

PIT winsCGY wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CGY010010212232
PIT113217313643

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 17:14PITAnthony BeauvillierAssists: Blake Lizotte, Michael Bunting · Backhand, 0.05 xG0–1
  2. P2 2:40PITMichael BuntingPPAssists: Matt Grzelcyk, Kris Letang · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–2
  3. P2 9:02PITPhilip TomasinoPPGWGAssists: Kris Letang, Michael Bunting · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–3
  4. P3 5:25PITRickard RakellAssists: Sidney Crosby, Bryan Rust · Backhand, 0.19 xG0–4
  5. P3 7:59PITKris LetangPPAssists: Matt Grzelcyk, Kevin Hayes · Slap, 0.04 xG0–5
  6. P3 14:27CGYJonathan HuberdeauAssists: Nazem Kadri, Martin Pospisil · Wrist, 0.17 xG1–5
  7. P3 15:05CGYNazem KadriAssists: Jonathan Huberdeau, Kevin Bahl · Wrist, 0.17 xG2–5
  8. P3 18:23PITBlake LizotteAssists: Drew O'Connor · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–6
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 4:16PITRyan Shea: Hooking2 min
  2. P2 2:33CGYConnor Zary: Slashing2 min · PPG
  3. P2 2:57PITBlake Lizotte: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 7:04CGYBrayden Pachal: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  5. P2 15:53CGYRasmus Andersson: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 19:19PITSidney Crosby: Hooking2 min
  7. P3 6:18CGYKevin Rooney: Hooking2 min · PPG
  8. P3 10:50CGYMartin Pospisil: Tripping2 min
  9. P3 18:23CGYRasmus Andersson: Abuse of officials10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CGY00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
43% to win57% to win
← CGY attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Backlund won the faceoff against Malkin
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CGYPIT
32Shots on goal43
2.3Expected goals4.2
71Shot attempts73
30Faceoffs won35
3Power plays5
20Penalty minutes6
16Hits12
13Blocked shots23
10Giveaways13
14Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestBacklund – Sharangovich – Coronato11:27

    xG 0.51–0.10 (83%)attempts 18–7goals 0–0

  2. Kadri – Pospisil – Kuzmenko8:10

    xG 0.16–0.22 (42%)attempts 15–5goals 0–0

  3. Kadri – Huberdeau – Pospisil2:48

    xG 0.50–0.62 (45%)attempts 8–3goals 2–0

  4. Lomberg – Rooney – Klapka6:48

    xG 0.13–0.64 (17%)attempts 4–15goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestWeegar – Miromanov12:51

    xG 0.80–0.71 (53%)attempts 14–14goals 1–1

  2. Bean – Pachal12:54

    xG 0.37–0.84 (31%)attempts 19–19goals 0–2

  3. Andersson – Bahl13:57

    xG 0.50–0.99 (34%)attempts 23–15goals 1–0

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCrosby – Rust – Rakell11:26

    xG 1.40–0.55 (72%)attempts 19–19goals 0–0

  2. Bunting – Beauvillier – Lizotte6:33

    xG 0.32–0.04 (89%)attempts 9–5goals 1–0

  3. Malkin – Tomasino – O'Connor9:14

    xG 0.24–0.48 (34%)attempts 9–18goals 0–1

  4. Hayes – Nieto – Acciari7:39

    xG 0.19–0.44 (30%)attempts 7–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestShea – Pickering10:59

    xG 0.61–0.14 (82%)attempts 14–7goals 2–0

  2. Karlsson – Pettersson15:11

    xG 0.82–0.61 (57%)attempts 21–21goals 1–1

  3. Letang – Grzelcyk13:50

    xG 1.02–0.84 (55%)attempts 13–25goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 4.2 xGCGY 2.3 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITCGY

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it CGY. Dots are goals.

Excitement 60/100 · #522 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.56 · 5 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 55% (winner's lowest chance)
CGY 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +14 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 78% of the time.

PIT winsCGY wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − CGY), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).