Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Dec 12, 2024·Centre Bell, Montreal

Pittsburgh Penguins 9, Montréal Canadiens 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 75% of the time.

MTL winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT11029614933
MTL1611106223

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:12MTLNick SuzukiAssists: Cole Caufield · Backhand, 0.12 xG0–1
  2. P1 4:18PITRickard RakellPPAssists: Kris Letang, Matt Grzelcyk · Snap, 0.34 xG1–1
  3. P2 10:03PITBryan RustAssists: Sidney Crosby · Wrist, 0.18 xG2–1
  4. P2 13:27PITBryan RustGWGAssists: Rickard Rakell, Sidney Crosby · Snap, 0.07 xG3–1
  5. P2 14:36MTLJoel ArmiaAssists: Emil Heineman, Jake Evans · Snap, 0.08 xG3–2
  6. P3 4:40PITRickard RakellAssists: Bryan Rust, Sidney Crosby · Snap, 0.20 xG4–2
  7. P3 7:42PITKris LetangPPAssists: Michael Bunting, Rickard Rakell · Snap, 0.03 xG5–2
  8. P3 8:41PITAnthony BeauvillierAssists: Cody Glass, Drew O'Connor · Poke, 0.12 xG6–2
  9. P3 11:56PITBryan RustUnassisted · Snap, 0.07 xG7–2
  10. P3 14:20PITMatt NietoAssists: Matt Grzelcyk, Blake Lizotte · Tip-in, 0.09 xG8–2
  11. P3 18:42PITNoel AcciariUnassisted · Snap, 0.26 xG9–2
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 3:11MTLPatrik Laine: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 19:11PITBlake Lizotte: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 3:02PITDrew O'Connor: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 6:53PITKris Letang: Slashing2 min
  5. P3 1:11MTLJosh Anderson: Interference2 min
  6. P3 5:51MTLJosh Anderson: High sticking2 min · PPG
  7. P3 9:24PITRyan Graves: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MTL
43% to win57% to win
← PIT attackMTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Suzuki
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITMTL
33Shots on goal23
3.9Expected goals2.3
66Shot attempts40
26Faceoffs won25
3Power plays4
8Penalty minutes6
11Hits26
8Blocked shots16
13Giveaways15
7Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCrosby – Rust – Rakell10:52

    xG 1.09–0.41 (73%)attempts 20–5goals 4–1

  2. Malkin – Bunting – Tomasino11:21

    xG 0.69–0.47 (60%)attempts 14–10goals 0–1

  3. Nieto – Acciari – Lizotte7:30

    xG 0.53–0.32 (63%)attempts 8–6goals 2–0

  4. Beauvillier – Glass – O'Connor8:42

    xG 0.52–0.31 (63%)attempts 13–4goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKarlsson – Pettersson13:50

    xG 1.45–0.29 (83%)attempts 25–4goals 3–0

  2. Grzelcyk – Graves9:45

    xG 0.80–0.27 (75%)attempts 11–6goals 3–0

  3. Letang – Pickering13:39

    xG 0.45–0.68 (40%)attempts 9–12goals 1–0

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestGallagher – Anderson – Dvorak7:33

    xG 0.52–0.31 (63%)attempts 8–10goals 0–2

  2. Suzuki – Caufield – Newhook6:09

    xG 0.35–0.15 (70%)attempts 4–4goals 1–0

  3. Suzuki – Caufield – Slafkovský5:44

    xG 0.25–0.10 (71%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  4. Armia – Anderson – Evans2:53

    xG 0.28–0.38 (42%)attempts 4–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestXhekaj – Hutson3:35

    xG 0.27–0.11 (72%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

  2. Matheson – Guhle3:40

    xG 0.28–0.21 (57%)attempts 4–3goals 0–1

  3. Matheson – Hutson10:26

    xG 0.58–0.52 (53%)attempts 8–12goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MTL 2.3 xGPIT 3.9 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MTLPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MTL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MTL is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 54/100 · #584 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.33 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 33% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50MTL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +24 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 75% of the time.

MTL winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (MTL − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).