Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Dec 14, 2024·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

Utah Hockey Club 4, San Jose Sharks 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Utah Hockey Club win this game 79% of the time.

SJS winsUTA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
UTA111112217440
SJS1811014322

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:27UTADylan GuentherAssists: Logan Cooley, Mikhail Sergachev · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–0
  2. P1 14:58SJSAlexander WennbergAssists: Barclay Goodrow, Cody Ceci · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–1
  3. P2 14:11SJSMikael GranlundAssists: Fabian Zetterlund, William Eklund · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–2
  4. P2 18:52UTANick SchmaltzPPAssists: Logan Cooley, Clayton Keller · Slap, 0.19 xG2–2
  5. P3 5:00SJSFabian ZetterlundPPAssists: Nikolai Kovalenko, Macklin Celebrini · Wrist, 0.16 xG2–3
  6. P3 9:49UTAMichael CarconeAssists: Kevin Stenlund, Alexander Kerfoot · Wrist, 0.14 xG3–3
  7. P3 19:16UTAClayton KellerPPGWGAssists: Mikhail Sergachev, Nick Schmaltz · Wrist, 0.14 xG4–3
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 3:11UTAJuuso Välimäki: Interference2 min
  2. P1 8:19SJSLuke Kunin: Holding the stick2 min
  3. P1 19:26UTALogan Cooley: Cross checking2 min
  4. P1 19:26SJSWilliam Eklund: Slashing2 min
  5. P2 4:06SJSLuke Kunin: Holding2 min
  6. P2 7:17SJSTimothy Liljegren: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 16:07UTANick Bjugstad: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 18:40SJSNico Sturm: Hooking2 min · PPG
  9. P3 0:55SJSMikael Granlund: High sticking2 min
  10. P3 3:35UTAOlli Maatta: Tripping2 min · PPG
  11. P3 18:39SJSJan Rutta: Roughing2 min · PPG
  12. P3 18:39UTAJack McBain: Roughing2 min
  13. P3 19:02SJSCody Ceci: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

UTA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
43% to win57% to win
← UTA attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Bjugstad won the faceoff against Wennberg
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

UTASJS
40Shots on goal22
3.6Expected goals1.8
73Shot attempts47
32Faceoffs won30
6Power plays3
10Penalty minutes16
17Hits15
12Blocked shots18
14Giveaways13
3Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Utah Hockey Club

Forward lines

  1. bestMcBain – Guenther – Cooley8:30

    xG 0.65–0.16 (80%)attempts 14–8goals 1–0

  2. Bjugstad – Crouse – Maccelli7:55

    xG 0.53–0.11 (83%)attempts 17–5goals 0–0

  3. Schmaltz – Keller – Hayton10:30

    xG 0.37–0.30 (56%)attempts 12–7goals 0–0

  4. Kerfoot – Stenlund – Carcone5:56

    xG 0.25–0.18 (58%)attempts 3–8goals 1–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestVälimäki – Kolyachonok5:58

    xG 0.43–0.12 (78%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

  2. Cole – Maatta5:04

    xG 0.27–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  3. Cole – Välimäki2:23

    xG 0.26–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 1–0

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestToffoli – Kovalenko – Celebrini8:56

    xG 0.36–0.30 (55%)attempts 10–6goals 0–0

  2. Zetterlund – Dellandrea – Sturm2:54

    xG 0.05–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. Granlund – Zetterlund – Eklund6:29

    xG 0.34–0.30 (53%)attempts 8–10goals 1–0

  4. Goodrow – Wennberg – Smith7:11

    xG 0.14–0.38 (27%)attempts 7–10goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. Ceci – Walman12:22

    xG 0.57–0.71 (44%)attempts 11–18goals 1–1

  2. Ferraro – Liljegren11:55

    xG 0.18–0.49 (26%)attempts 7–18goals 0–1

  3. Rutta – Mukhamadullin10:39

    xG 0.21–0.66 (24%)attempts 11–15goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 1.8 xGUTA 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSUTA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it UTA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 88/100 · #146 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.34 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 16% (winner's lowest chance)
UTA 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +51 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Utah Hockey Club win this game 79% of the time.

SJS winsUTA wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − UTA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).