Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Dec 16, 2024·Rogers Place, Edmonton

Florida Panthers 6, Edmonton Oilers 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 53% of the time.

EDM winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
FLA2919310628
EDM110310110530

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:42FLAJesper BoqvistSHUnassisted · Snap, 0.12 xG1–0
  2. P1 15:13EDMZach HymanAssists: Connor McDavid, Evan Bouchard · Snap, 0.13 xG1–1
  3. P1 19:32FLAMatthew TkachukPPAssists: Carter Verhaeghe, Sam Reinhart · Deflected, 0.16 xG2–1
  4. P2 6:20EDMZach HymanAssists: Connor McDavid, Leon Draisaitl · Backhand, 0.06 xG2–2
  5. P2 7:03EDMConnor BrownAssists: Corey Perry · Snap, 0.03 xG2–3
  6. P2 9:24EDMLeon DraisaitlPPAssists: Connor McDavid, Mattias Ekholm · Snap, 0.03 xG2–4
  7. P2 17:55FLAGustav ForslingAssists: Anton Lundell, Aaron Ekblad · Snap, 0.03 xG3–4
  8. P3 6:53FLANiko MikkolaAssists: Anton Lundell, Eetu Luostarinen · Snap, 0.12 xG4–4
  9. P3 7:23FLASam ReinhartUnassisted · Snap, 0.02 xG5–4
  10. P3 8:02EDMKasperi KapanenAssists: Brett Kulak · Wrist, 0.10 xG5–5
  11. P3 13:05FLACarter VerhaegheGWGAssists: Sam Bennett, Niko Mikkola · Snap, 0.14 xG6–5
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 2:33FLANiko Mikkola: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 2:49EDMEvan Bouchard: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 15:44EDMDarnell Nurse: Tripping2 min
  4. P1 15:44EDMDarnell Nurse: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  5. P2 3:27FLADmitry Kulikov: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 7:43FLAA.J. Greer: Boarding2 min · PPG
  7. P2 7:43FLAA.J. Greer: Fighting5 min
  8. P2 7:43EDMVasily Podkolzin: Fighting5 min
  9. P2 18:48EDMDarnell Nurse: Elbowing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
43% to win57% to win
← FLA attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Lundell won the faceoff against Draisaitl
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLAEDM
28Shots on goal30
2.5Expected goals2.7
55Shot attempts50
27Faceoffs won38
4Power plays3
11Penalty minutes13
39Hits21
13Blocked shots15
16Giveaways16
3Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestRodrigues – Boqvist – Samoskevich7:47

    xG 0.26–0.03 (90%)attempts 10–3goals 0–0

  2. Nosek – Greer – Gadjovich5:58

    xG 0.31–0.20 (60%)attempts 8–2goals 0–0

  3. Verhaeghe – Bennett – Tkachuk12:01

    xG 0.65–0.68 (49%)attempts 9–9goals 1–2

  4. Reinhart – Luostarinen – Lundell10:44

    xG 0.22–0.28 (43%)attempts 9–10goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSchmidt – Balinskis9:33

    xG 0.33–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–0goals 0–0

  2. Kulikov – Mikkola14:19

    xG 0.53–0.39 (57%)attempts 12–10goals 2–2

  3. Ekblad – Forsling15:01

    xG 0.76–1.08 (41%)attempts 14–21goals 1–2

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestHyman – Draisaitl – McDavid8:17

    xG 0.66–0.19 (78%)attempts 10–5goals 2–0

  2. Draisaitl – Kapanen – Podkolzin2:52

    xG 0.41–0.04 (92%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  3. Nugent-Hopkins – Kapanen – Podkolzin6:21

    xG 0.21–0.00 (100%)attempts 8–2goals 1–0

  4. Hyman – Nugent-Hopkins – McDavid3:31

    xG 0.10–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkholm – Bouchard14:28

    xG 0.80–0.24 (77%)attempts 18–9goals 2–1

  2. Kulak – Nurse7:25

    xG 0.57–0.08 (87%)attempts 11–5goals 1–0

  3. Stecher – Emberson2:33

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 2.7 xGFLA 2.5 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 99/100 · #12 of 1312 this seasonSwing 3.03 · 11 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 9% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +38 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 53% of the time.

EDM winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).