Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Dec 31, 2024·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Vancouver Canucks 1, Calgary Flames 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 82% of the time.

CGY winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VAN0110815124
CGY11206211329

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 14:31CGYConnor ZaryAssists: Yegor Sharangovich, Jakob Pelletier · Tip-in, 0.16 xG0–1
  2. P3 6:15VANBrock BoeserPPAssists: J.T. Miller, Erik Brannstrom · Tip-in, 0.10 xG1–1
  3. P3 9:18CGYNazem KadriGWGAssists: Jonathan Huberdeau, Martin Pospisil · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–2
  4. P3 18:58CGYJonathan HuberdeauENUnassisted · Snap, 0.56 xG1–3
Penalties (16)
  1. P1 7:01CGYRasmus Andersson: Roughing2 min
  2. P1 7:01VANJ.T. Miller: Roughing2 min
  3. P2 7:10VANErik Brannstrom: Fighting5 min
  4. P2 7:10CGYRyan Lomberg: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 7:12CGYKevin Bahl: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 7:12VANJ.T. Miller: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 10:03VANNoah Juulsen: Tripping2 min
  8. P2 10:03CGYMacKenzie Weegar: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 10:03VANNoah Juulsen: Roughing2 min
  10. P2 10:46VANTyler Myers: Cross checking2 min
  11. P2 13:14CGYRyan Lomberg: Fighting5 min
  12. P2 13:14VANDerek Forbort: Fighting5 min
  13. P2 13:47VANVincent Desharnais: Roughing2 min
  14. P2 13:47CGYBlake Coleman: Roughing2 min
  15. P2 16:16CGYMikael Backlund: Hooking2 min
  16. P3 5:37CGYBlake Coleman: High sticking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
43% to win57% to win
← VAN attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Miller won the faceoff against Backlund
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANCGY
24Shots on goal29
1.8Expected goals3.8
47Shot attempts62
34Faceoffs won31
2Power plays2
25Penalty minutes25
29Hits28
16Blocked shots11
11Giveaways15
4Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestMiller – Boeser – DeBrusk11:02

    xG 0.65–0.29 (69%)attempts 12–8goals 0–0

  2. Di Giuseppe – Joshua – Sasson4:46

    xG 0.17–0.07 (70%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

  3. Joshua – Garland – Suter4:34

    xG 0.03–0.17 (14%)attempts 2–7goals 0–1

  4. Di Giuseppe – Hoglander – Sasson2:09

    xG 0.00–0.16 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMyers – Forbort14:17

    xG 0.56–0.35 (61%)attempts 16–12goals 0–0

  2. Desharnais – Brannstrom11:06

    xG 0.19–0.74 (21%)attempts 6–18goals 0–1

  3. Soucy – Juulsen14:56

    xG 0.36–0.95 (27%)attempts 8–19goals 0–1

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestSharangovich – Pelletier – Zary7:15

    xG 1.06–0.08 (93%)attempts 18–5goals 1–0

  2. Kadri – Huberdeau – Pospisil10:48

    xG 0.44–0.10 (81%)attempts 13–9goals 1–0

  3. Backlund – Coleman – Coronato13:03

    xG 0.29–0.25 (54%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0

  4. Lomberg – Rooney – Duehr5:12

    xG 0.09–0.16 (37%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestWeegar – Hanley15:48

    xG 0.91–0.22 (80%)attempts 22–10goals 2–0

  2. Andersson – Bahl15:56

    xG 0.69–0.65 (52%)attempts 12–13goals 0–0

  3. Bean – Pachal11:04

    xG 0.42–0.51 (45%)attempts 19–9goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 3.8 xGVAN 1.8 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 20/100 · #1043 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.06 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 55% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +29 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 82% of the time.

CGY winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).