Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Jan 2, 2025·Climate Pledge Arena, Seattle

Vancouver Canucks 4, Seattle Kraken 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 52% of the time.

SEA winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
VAN1611015011422
SEA1901027010327

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:52SEAChandler StephensonAssists: Andre Burakovsky, Vince Dunn · Wrist, 0.03 xG0–1
  2. P1 13:17VANMax SassonAssists: Danton Heinen, Nils Hoglander · Snap, 0.23 xG1–1
  3. P2 7:49VANConor GarlandAssists: Phillip Di Giuseppe, Derek Forbort · Wrist, 0.19 xG2–1
  4. P3 5:35VANTyler MyersAssists: J.T. Miller, Jake DeBrusk · Wrist, 0.06 xG3–1
  5. P3 9:05SEAMatty BeniersPPAssists: Shane Wright, Brandon Montour · Slap, 0.23 xG3–2
  6. P3 19:07SEAVince DunnAssists: Andre Burakovsky, Matty Beniers · Wrist, 0.01 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. SEA Oliver Bjorkstrand stopped
  2. 2. VAN J.T. Miller scored
  3. 3. SEA Kaapo Kakko stopped
  4. 4. VAN Jake DeBrusk stopped
  5. 5. SEA Matty Beniers stopped
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 13:43VANDakota Joshua: Roughing2 min
  2. P1 13:43SEABrandon Montour: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 17:04VANJ.T. Miller: Cross checking2 min
  4. P1 19:15SEAAndre Burakovsky: Hooking2 min
  5. P3 0:48SEAJaden Schwartz: Tripping2 min
  6. P3 7:08VANJ.T. Miller: Hooking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SEA
43% to win57% to win
← VAN attackSEA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Gourde won the faceoff against Blueger
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANSEA
22Shots on goal27
2.7Expected goals2.7
63Shot attempts62
30Faceoffs won27
2Power plays2
6Penalty minutes6
20Hits19
16Blocked shots17
12Giveaways15
10Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestDi Giuseppe – Garland – Suter8:52

    xG 0.61–0.09 (87%)attempts 16–6goals 1–0

  2. Blueger – Joshua – Sherwood8:48

    xG 0.13–0.14 (48%)attempts 10–3goals 0–0

  3. Miller – Boeser – DeBrusk6:58

    xG 0.10–0.19 (34%)attempts 5–5goals 1–0

  4. Heinen – Hoglander – Sasson8:19

    xG 0.31–0.45 (41%)attempts 5–14goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestForbort – Desharnais15:16

    xG 0.84–0.26 (76%)attempts 23–10goals 1–1

  2. Soucy – Juulsen13:23

    xG 0.83–0.48 (63%)attempts 12–13goals 1–0

  3. Myers – Brisebois13:53

    xG 0.27–0.35 (44%)attempts 13–12goals 1–0

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. bestBjorkstrand – Tolvanen – Wright7:05

    xG 0.44–0.15 (74%)attempts 10–10goals 0–0

  2. Stephenson – Burakovsky – McCann9:36

    xG 0.10–0.15 (40%)attempts 6–5goals 1–0

  3. Gourde – Tanev – Kartye8:54

    xG 0.24–0.36 (41%)attempts 6–11goals 0–2

  4. Schwartz – Bjorkstrand – Wright2:02

    xG 0.00–0.25 (0%)attempts 0–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestOleksiak – Montour9:55

    xG 0.33–0.15 (69%)attempts 11–7goals 0–0

  2. Mahura – Evans7:04

    xG 0.41–0.24 (63%)attempts 6–5goals 0–1

  3. Montour – Dunn5:28

    xG 0.18–0.19 (48%)attempts 10–4goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SEA 2.7 xGVAN 2.7 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SEAVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SEA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SEA is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 89/100 · #138 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.26 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 31% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50SEA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +50 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 52% of the time.

SEA winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (SEA − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).