Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Jan 14, 2025·Delta Center, Salt Lake City

Montréal Canadiens 5, Utah Hockey Club 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Utah Hockey Club win this game 67% of the time.

UTA winsMTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MTL13212212527
UTA2140615325

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:11UTAJosh DoanPPAssists: Clayton Keller, Nick Schmaltz · Wrist, 0.44 xG0–1
  2. P1 3:18MTLMike MathesonAssists: Cole Caufield, Lane Hutson · Snap, 0.16 xG1–1
  3. P1 19:06UTANick BjugstadAssists: Michael Kesselring, Matias Maccelli · Backhand, 0.06 xG1–2
  4. P2 10:40MTLPatrik LaineAssists: Alex Newhook, Alexandre Carrier · Snap, 0.06 xG2–2
  5. P2 18:34MTLKirby DachAssists: Lane Hutson · Backhand, 0.19 xG3–2
  6. P3 3:07UTALogan CooleyAssists: Clayton Keller, Nick Schmaltz · Wrist, 0.11 xG3–3
  7. P3 6:33MTLCole CaufieldGWGAssists: Lane Hutson, Mike Matheson · Tip-in, 0.11 xG4–3
  8. P3 16:15MTLKirby DachAssists: Alexandre Carrier · Snap, 0.03 xG5–3
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 0:29MTLMichael Pezzetta: Holding the stick2 min · PPG
  2. P1 1:04MTLMike Matheson: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 13:37MTLPatrik Laine: Cross checking2 min
  4. P1 17:05MTLKirby Dach: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 0:21UTAJack McBain: High sticking2 min
  6. P2 3:58UTAOlli Maatta: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 6:54UTAMichael Kesselring: Misconduct10 min
  8. P2 6:54MTLArber Xhekaj: Misconduct10 min
  9. P2 7:35UTABarrett Hayton: Roughing2 min
  10. P2 16:52UTAMatias Maccelli: Roughing2 min
  11. P2 16:52MTLJosh Anderson: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 6:57MTLBrendan Gallagher: Tripping2 min
  13. P3 12:56MTLJuraj Slafkovský: Interference2 min
  14. P3 13:21UTAMikhail Sergachev: Penalty shot hooking on breakaway0 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MTL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0UTA
43% to win57% to win
← MTL attackUTA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Evans won the faceoff against McBain
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MTLUTA
27Shots on goal25
3.6Expected goals4.8
56Shot attempts65
32Faceoffs won31
3Power plays6
24Penalty minutes18
22Hits19
17Blocked shots14
3Giveaways9
7Takeaways13

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestLaine – Dach – Newhook8:50

    xG 0.35–0.25 (58%)attempts 8–9goals 2–0

  2. Armia – Evans – Pezzetta2:44

    xG 0.00–0.04 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

  3. Suzuki – Caufield – Slafkovský9:15

    xG 0.38–0.43 (46%)attempts 7–7goals 2–0

  4. Gallagher – Anderson – Dvorak6:30

    xG 0.00–0.18 (0%)attempts 1–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestCarrier – Guhle13:18

    xG 0.89–0.29 (76%)attempts 21–12goals 2–1

  2. Xhekaj – Hutson2:03

    xG 0.04–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  3. Savard – Xhekaj4:52

    xG 0.23–0.25 (47%)attempts 3–7goals 0–0

Utah Hockey Club

Forward lines

  1. bestHayton – Maccelli – Doan6:33

    xG 0.80–0.06 (93%)attempts 11–2goals 0–1

  2. Bjugstad – Crouse – McBain5:33

    xG 0.38–0.13 (75%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  3. Schmaltz – Keller – Cooley9:57

    xG 0.65–0.49 (57%)attempts 12–7goals 1–1

  4. Kerfoot – Stenlund – Carcone5:44

    xG 0.06–0.20 (22%)attempts 4–2goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestCole – Marino5:27

    xG 0.81–0.30 (73%)attempts 10–2goals 1–0

  2. Cole – Välimäki2:35

    xG 0.36–0.07 (83%)attempts 6–2goals 0–1

  3. Cole – Kesselring4:07

    xG 0.29–0.11 (72%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

UTA 4.8 xGMTL 3.6 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

UTAMTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

UTA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line UTA is favoured, below it MTL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 86/100 · #177 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.15 · 8 goals in reachComeback index 25% (winner's lowest chance)
MTL 100%5050%50UTA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +32 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Utah Hockey Club win this game 67% of the time.

UTA winsMTL wins

Simulated goal difference (UTA − MTL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).