Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Jan 15, 2025·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Edmonton Oilers 5, Minnesota Wild 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 51% of the time.

MIN winsEDM wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
EDM214111211536
MIN212110012334

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:02MINMatt BoldyPPAssists: Joel Eriksson Ek, Mats Zuccarello · Wrist, 0.13 xG0–1
  2. P1 16:11MINMarco RossiPPAssists: Matt Boldy, Mats Zuccarello · Snap, 0.16 xG0–2
  3. P1 16:32EDMZach HymanAssists: Leon Draisaitl, Connor McDavid · Wrist, 0.23 xG1–2
  4. P1 18:28EDMConnor McDavidPPAssists: Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, Evan Bouchard · Snap, 0.10 xG2–2
  5. P2 4:09MINRyan HartmanAssists: Joel Eriksson Ek · Backhand, 0.15 xG2–3
  6. P2 14:15EDMRyan Nugent-HopkinsAssists: Ty Emberson, Brett Kulak · Tip-in, 0.05 xG3–3
  7. P3 1:28EDMVasily PodkolzinGWGAssists: Viktor Arvidsson, Joshua Brown · Tip-in, 0.01 xG4–3
  8. P3 12:49EDMConnor McDavidUnassisted · Wrist, 0.07 xG5–3
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 1:58EDMDarnell Nurse: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 6:11EDMMattias Janmark: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 15:04EDMJoshua Brown: Roughing2 min · PPG
  4. P1 18:08MINDavid Jiricek: Holding2 min · PPG
  5. P3 0:00MINRyan Hartman: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

EDM00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
43% to win57% to win
← EDM attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Rossi won the faceoff against McDavid
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

EDMMIN
36Shots on goal34
2.6Expected goals2.6
64Shot attempts64
31Faceoffs won28
1Power plays3
6Penalty minutes4
13Hits20
16Blocked shots10
21Giveaways15
1Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestNugent-Hopkins – Arvidsson – Podkolzin9:26

    xG 0.42–0.16 (72%)attempts 13–5goals 2–0

  2. Hyman – Draisaitl – McDavid11:00

    xG 0.78–0.71 (52%)attempts 14–12goals 1–1

  3. Perry – Kapanen – Philp6:25

    xG 0.18–0.15 (55%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

  4. Draisaitl – Arvidsson – Podkolzin2:56

    xG 0.00–0.09 (0%)attempts 0–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkholm – Bouchard17:16

    xG 1.34–1.09 (55%)attempts 25–14goals 1–1

  2. Kulak – Emberson14:32

    xG 0.50–0.33 (60%)attempts 17–12goals 2–0

  3. Kulak – Nurse2:30

    xG 0.00–0.02 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestJohansson – Hartman – Eriksson Ek9:08

    xG 0.63–0.54 (54%)attempts 8–12goals 1–0

  2. Foligno – Hartman – Eriksson Ek3:23

    xG 0.10–0.07 (57%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  3. Foligno – Gaudreau – Trenin7:45

    xG 0.05–0.15 (26%)attempts 5–6goals 0–1

  4. Shore – Jones – Khusnutdinov3:43

    xG 0.07–0.24 (22%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMerrill – Middleton18:58

    xG 1.23–0.89 (58%)attempts 23–24goals 1–1

  2. Dermott – Jiricek8:32

    xG 0.28–0.33 (46%)attempts 6–9goals 0–0

  3. Bogosian – Chisholm17:22

    xG 0.49–0.76 (39%)attempts 13–18goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.6 xGEDM 2.6 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINEDM

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it EDM. Dots are goals.

Excitement 78/100 · #280 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.57 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 18% (winner's lowest chance)
EDM 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +29 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 51% of the time.

MIN winsEDM wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − EDM), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).