Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Jan 16, 2025·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

San Jose Sharks 1, Columbus Blue Jackets 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 88% of the time.

CBJ winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS0602111119
CBJ21311219434

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:11CBJAdam FantilliAssists: Zach Werenski · Snap, 0.16 xG0–1
  2. P1 16:17CBJKent JohnsonGWGAssists: Sean Kuraly · Snap, 0.17 xG0–2
  3. P2 6:37CBJJames van RiemsdykAssists: Damon Severson, Kent Johnson · Tip-in, 0.06 xG0–3
  4. P3 7:32SJSTyler ToffoliAssists: Macklin Celebrini · Wrist, 0.25 xG1–3
  5. P3 17:59CBJJames van RiemsdykENAssists: Kirill Marchenko · Wrist, 0.75 xG1–4
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 1:42CBJCole Sillinger: High sticking2 min
  2. P2 8:23SJSTyler Toffoli: High sticking2 min
  3. P2 15:37CBJDenton Mateychuk: Holding2 min
  4. P2 0:00CBJKent Johnson: Hooking2 min
  5. P3 9:27SJSTimothy Liljegren: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
43% to win57% to win
← SJS attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Del Bel Belluz won the faceoff against Dellandrea
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSCBJ
19Shots on goal34
2.2Expected goals5.0
58Shot attempts62
33Faceoffs won22
3Power plays2
4Penalty minutes6
12Hits13
17Blocked shots24
19Giveaways16
8Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestToffoli – Eklund – Celebrini10:43

    xG 0.83–0.34 (71%)attempts 19–11goals 1–1

  2. Wennberg – Kunin – Graf2:51

    xG 0.17–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Goodrow – Dellandrea – Sturm8:17

    xG 0.26–0.13 (66%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  4. Wennberg – Kunin – Smith5:06

    xG 0.24–0.13 (65%)attempts 3–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestFerraro – Rutta2:44

    xG 0.52–0.22 (70%)attempts 11–3goals 0–1

  2. Ceci – Walman15:53

    xG 0.73–0.52 (58%)attempts 15–16goals 0–0

  3. Vlasic – Rutta11:03

    xG 0.04–0.31 (11%)attempts 9–10goals 0–1

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestKuraly – Labanc – Pyyhtia6:31

    xG 0.43–0.21 (67%)attempts 12–4goals 0–0

  2. van Riemsdyk – Johnson – Sillinger10:08

    xG 0.63–0.61 (50%)attempts 10–5goals 1–1

  3. Olivier – Aston-Reese – Del Bel Belluz8:59

    xG 0.00–0.16 (0%)attempts 3–7goals 0–0

  4. Marchenko – Voronkov – Fantilli10:22

    xG 0.44–0.78 (36%)attempts 8–21goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSeverson – Christiansen10:35

    xG 1.01–0.20 (84%)attempts 9–7goals 2–0

  2. Werenski – Fabbro15:06

    xG 1.11–0.50 (69%)attempts 21–9goals 0–0

  3. Severson – Werenski3:09

    xG 0.16–0.01 (96%)attempts 4–3goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 5.0 xGSJS 2.2 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 22/100 · #1018 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.58 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 55% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +13 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 88% of the time.

CBJ winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).