Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Jan 20, 2025·Climate Pledge Arena, Seattle

Buffalo Sabres 4, Seattle Kraken 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 59% of the time.

SEA winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF11221017429
SEA210213211634

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:07BUFJack QuinnAssists: Owen Power, Peyton Krebs · Wrist, 0.02 xG1–0
  2. P1 5:34SEAJohn HaydenAssists: Mitchell Stephens, Ryker Evans · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–1
  3. P1 11:06SEAChandler StephensonAssists: Oliver Bjorkstrand, Ryker Evans · Snap, 0.10 xG1–2
  4. P2 6:41SEAMatty BeniersPPAssists: Chandler Stephenson, Vince Dunn · Wrist, 0.17 xG1–3
  5. P2 9:31BUFJason ZuckerPPAssists: Rasmus Dahlin, Tage Thompson · Tip-in, 0.12 xG2–3
  6. P2 15:38BUFTage ThompsonAssists: Mattias Samuelsson, Peyton Krebs · Wrist, 0.06 xG3–3
  7. P2 16:34SEAJamie OleksiakAssists: Shane Wright, Jared McCann · Snap, 0.12 xG3–4
  8. P3 10:25SEAAdam LarssonGWGAssists: Jared McCann, Eeli Tolvanen · Slap, 0.05 xG3–5
  9. P3 18:39BUFAlex TuchAssists: Jason Zucker, Dylan Cozens · Snap, 0.30 xG4–5
  10. P3 18:56SEAJared McCannENAssists: Jamie Oleksiak, Adam Larsson · Wrist, 0.40 xG4–6
Penalties (5)
  1. P2 0:19BUFJiri Kulich: Slashing2 min
  2. P2 3:20SEAMitchell Stephens: Holding2 min
  3. P2 5:19BUFZach Benson: Hooking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 8:17SEAEeli Tolvanen: Hooking2 min · PPG
  5. P3 3:57SEAAndre Burakovsky: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SEA
43% to win57% to win
← BUF attackSEA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Beniers won the faceoff against Kulich
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFSEA
29Shots on goal34
3.1Expected goals3.6
64Shot attempts59
25Faceoffs won27
3Power plays2
4Penalty minutes6
18Hits16
7Blocked shots11
15Giveaways12
4Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestZucker – Thompson – Kulich10:32

    xG 0.86–0.38 (70%)attempts 11–11goals 1–1

  2. Krebs – Quinn – Benson8:32

    xG 0.39–0.34 (53%)attempts 13–7goals 1–1

  3. Tuch – Cozens – Peterka6:56

    xG 0.24–0.21 (53%)attempts 4–9goals 0–0

  4. Aube-Kubel – Lafferty – Malenstyn4:49

    xG 0.09–0.16 (36%)attempts 5–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestDahlin – Power3:02

    xG 0.33–0.10 (77%)attempts 5–2goals 0–1

  2. Clifton – Bryson10:20

    xG 0.22–0.37 (38%)attempts 9–13goals 0–1

  3. Dahlin – Byram13:49

    xG 0.59–0.80 (43%)attempts 13–13goals 0–1

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. bestStephenson – Bjorkstrand – Burakovsky9:37

    xG 0.52–0.17 (76%)attempts 12–6goals 1–0

  2. McCann – Tolvanen – Wright8:13

    xG 0.64–0.30 (68%)attempts 11–9goals 2–1

  3. Hayden – Stephens – Tanev6:18

    xG 0.19–0.21 (48%)attempts 7–8goals 1–0

  4. Schwartz – Kakko – Beniers12:02

    xG 0.59–0.62 (49%)attempts 13–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestOleksiak – Mahura12:10

    xG 0.62–0.20 (75%)attempts 17–10goals 1–0

  2. Montour – Evans18:21

    xG 1.00–0.67 (60%)attempts 18–19goals 2–2

  3. Larsson – Dunn15:55

    xG 0.69–0.68 (50%)attempts 15–11goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SEA 3.6 xGBUF 3.1 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SEABUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SEA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SEA is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 87/100 · #155 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.68 · 10 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 42% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50SEA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 59% of the time.

SEA winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (SEA − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).