Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Jan 26, 2025·Madison Square Garden, New York

Colorado Avalanche 5, New York Rangers 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, New York Rangers win this game 55% of the time.

NYR winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
COL3131613522
NYR210113114437

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:43COLJack DruryAssists: Keaton Middleton, Jonathan Drouin · Tip-in, 0.04 xG1–0
  2. P1 6:26COLCale MakarAssists: Martin Necas, Nathan MacKinnon · Snap, 0.15 xG2–0
  3. P1 7:10NYRSam CarrickAssists: Matt Rempe, Urho Vaakanainen · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–1
  4. P1 8:36NYRVincent TrocheckAssists: Alexis Lafrenière, Artemi Panarin · Wrist, 0.16 xG2–2
  5. P1 14:36COLCale MakarPPAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Martin Necas · Snap, 0.08 xG3–2
  6. P2 16:01COLJuuso ParssinenAssists: Casey Mittelstadt · Snap, 0.10 xG4–2
  7. P2 18:05NYRWill BorgenAssists: Reilly Smith, Will Cuylle · Poke, 0.17 xG4–3
  8. P3 15:02NYRArtemi PanarinAssists: Vincent Trocheck, Reilly Smith · Wrist, 0.10 xG4–4
  9. P3 19:45COLArtturi LehkonenGWGAssists: Cale Makar · Snap, 0.12 xG5–4
Penalties (4)
  1. P1 14:13NYRAdam Fox: Holding2 min · PPG
  2. P2 8:28NYRAdam Edstrom: Interference2 min
  3. P3 1:40COLCasey Mittelstadt: Cross checking2 min
  4. P3 17:36COLCale Makar: Holding the stick2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NYR
43% to win57% to win
← COL attackNYR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Zibanejad won the faceoff against MacKinnon
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLNYR
22Shots on goal37
2.9Expected goals3.2
61Shot attempts74
22Faceoffs won29
2Power plays2
4Penalty minutes4
16Hits16
17Blocked shots20
21Giveaways18
7Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestLehkonen – Mittelstadt – Parssinen11:58

    xG 0.40–0.22 (65%)attempts 6–11goals 1–0

  2. MacKinnon – Drouin – Necas14:42

    xG 0.84–0.82 (51%)attempts 22–14goals 1–2

  3. Wood – Colton – Drury7:52

    xG 0.58–0.81 (42%)attempts 4–18goals 0–1

  4. Kelly – O'Connor – Kiviranta9:17

    xG 0.08–0.66 (11%)attempts 12–14goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestManson – Girard16:13

    xG 0.79–0.58 (58%)attempts 18–17goals 1–1

  2. Manson – Malinski2:28

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–0goals 0–0

  3. Toews – Makar18:39

    xG 0.83–1.04 (44%)attempts 15–26goals 1–1

New York Rangers

Forward lines

  1. bestSmith – Zibanejad – Cuylle10:02

    xG 0.86–0.30 (74%)attempts 17–10goals 1–0

  2. Kreider – Chytil – Kaliyev9:54

    xG 0.60–0.15 (80%)attempts 13–6goals 0–1

  3. Carrick – Edstrom – Rempe6:57

    xG 0.27–0.02 (92%)attempts 9–10goals 1–0

  4. Trocheck – Panarin – Lafrenière16:11

    xG 0.71–1.24 (37%)attempts 19–15goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestVaakanainen – Schneider14:35

    xG 0.72–0.36 (67%)attempts 15–17goals 1–1

  2. Borgen – Miller16:28

    xG 1.14–0.83 (58%)attempts 24–18goals 2–3

  3. Fox – Lindgren14:53

    xG 0.95–0.78 (55%)attempts 25–13goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NYR 3.2 xGCOL 2.9 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NYRCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NYR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NYR is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 97/100 · #42 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.53 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 38% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50NYR 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +52 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, New York Rangers win this game 55% of the time.

NYR winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (NYR − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).