Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Jan 27, 2025·Rogers Place, Edmonton

Seattle Kraken 2, Edmonton Oilers 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 64% of the time.

EDM winsSEA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SEA2120808228
EDM11221118431

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:37SEAEeli TolvanenAssists: John Hayden, Shane Wright · Snap, 0.24 xG1–0
  2. P1 14:27EDMMattias JanmarkAssists: Connor Brown, Ryan Nugent-Hopkins · Deflected, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P1 17:41SEAVince DunnAssists: Matty Beniers · Slap, 0.05 xG2–1
  4. P2 1:57EDMConnor McDavidAssists: Leon Draisaitl, Mattias Ekholm · Snap, 0.18 xG2–2
  5. P2 9:38EDMCorey PerryGWGAssists: Darnell Nurse · Snap, 0.18 xG2–3
  6. P3 19:02EDMMattias EkholmENUnassisted · Snap, 0.25 xG2–4
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 0:41SEARyker Evans: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 3:37EDMZach Hyman: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min
  3. P1 18:25EDMRyan Nugent-Hopkins: Cross checking2 min
  4. P1 19:15EDMConnor Brown: Tripping2 min
  5. P3 0:59EDMViktor Arvidsson: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SEA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
43% to win57% to win
← SEA attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00McDavid won the faceoff against Beniers
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SEAEDM
28Shots on goal31
2.7Expected goals3.5
52Shot attempts60
23Faceoffs won24
4Power plays1
2Penalty minutes8
18Hits14
15Blocked shots11
16Giveaways22
1Takeaways0

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. Hayden – Stephens – Tanev4:56

    xG 0.14–0.16 (46%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

  2. Schwartz – Kakko – Beniers12:52

    xG 0.32–0.47 (41%)attempts 7–9goals 1–0

  3. Stephenson – Bjorkstrand – Burakovsky9:48

    xG 0.67–0.83 (44%)attempts 12–15goals 0–1

  4. McCann – Tolvanen – Wright9:33

    xG 0.28–0.64 (30%)attempts 7–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestOleksiak – Mahura9:40

    xG 0.54–0.14 (79%)attempts 13–6goals 0–1

  2. Larsson – Dunn14:49

    xG 1.07–0.82 (57%)attempts 15–14goals 2–0

  3. Montour – Dunn2:17

    xG 0.00–0.36 (0%)attempts 0–8goals 0–0

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestHyman – Draisaitl – McDavid14:56

    xG 1.59–0.80 (66%)attempts 23–11goals 1–0

  2. Henrique – Arvidsson – Podkolzin8:26

    xG 0.50–0.22 (70%)attempts 12–6goals 0–0

  3. Perry – Kapanen – Philp6:45

    xG 0.05–0.01 (80%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  4. Nugent-Hopkins – Brown – Janmark8:43

    xG 0.11–0.38 (23%)attempts 2–11goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkholm – Bouchard16:08

    xG 1.67–0.58 (74%)attempts 21–11goals 1–1

  2. Kulak – Nurse10:01

    xG 0.40–0.35 (53%)attempts 12–6goals 0–0

  3. Nurse – Stecher4:53

    xG 0.00–0.07 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 3.5 xGSEA 2.7 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMSEA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it SEA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 47/100 · #686 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.42 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 35% (winner's lowest chance)
SEA 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 64% of the time.

EDM winsSEA wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − SEA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).