Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Jan 28, 2025·Climate Pledge Arena, Seattle

Anaheim Ducks 6, Seattle Kraken 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 55% of the time.

SEA winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA283619623
SEA37011112430

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:23ANATroy TerryAssists: Ryan Strome, Frank Vatrano · Wrist, 0.20 xG1–0
  2. P1 6:43SEAEeli TolvanenAssists: Brandon Montour · Slap, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P1 8:20SEAMitchell StephensAssists: Jamie Oleksiak, Tye Kartye · Backhand, 0.10 xG1–2
  4. P1 11:59ANACutter GauthierAssists: Robby Fabbri · Backhand, 0.08 xG2–2
  5. P1 14:01SEAJaden SchwartzAssists: Kaapo Kakko, Matty Beniers · Wrist, 0.10 xG2–3
  6. P2 1:04ANAMason McTavishAssists: Ryan Strome, Jackson LaCombe · Slap, 0.10 xG3–3
  7. P2 5:39ANARobby FabbriAssists: Mason McTavish · Snap, 0.09 xG4–3
  8. P2 7:58ANAJackson LaCombeGWGAssists: Isac Lundeström, Brett Leason · Wrist, 0.03 xG5–3
  9. P3 6:15SEAShane WrightPPAssists: Jared McCann, Brandon Montour · Snap, 0.11 xG5–4
  10. P3 18:44ANAFrank VatranoENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.63 xG6–4
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 9:30SEAJaden Schwartz: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 9:30ANAJackson LaCombe: Holding the stick2 min
  3. P1 15:21SEAJosh Mahura: Holding2 min
  4. P1 18:57SEAJared McCann: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 10:49ANAJackson LaCombe: Interference2 min
  6. P2 15:30SEATye Kartye: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 15:30ANAMason McTavish: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 1:28ANARyan Strome: Hooking2 min
  9. P3 4:48ANAJackson LaCombe: Hooking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SEA
43% to win57% to win
← ANA attackSEA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Beniers won the faceoff against McTavish
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANASEA
23Shots on goal30
2.4Expected goals2.7
46Shot attempts65
24Faceoffs won36
2Power plays3
10Penalty minutes8
16Hits12
19Blocked shots11
11Giveaways13
1Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. Strome – Vatrano – Terry11:04

    xG 0.43–0.49 (47%)attempts 10–8goals 1–1

  2. Killorn – Zegras – Carlsson7:43

    xG 0.09–0.27 (26%)attempts 2–12goals 0–0

  3. Fabbri – McTavish – Gauthier10:54

    xG 0.22–0.47 (32%)attempts 8–15goals 1–1

  4. Harkins – Lundeström – Leason7:59

    xG 0.10–0.37 (22%)attempts 5–5goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGudas – LaCombe13:54

    xG 0.56–0.01 (98%)attempts 14–8goals 3–0

  2. Trouba – Mintyukov12:55

    xG 0.23–0.64 (26%)attempts 5–14goals 1–3

  3. Dumoulin – Helleson12:37

    xG 0.17–0.95 (15%)attempts 7–20goals 0–0

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. bestSchwartz – Kakko – Beniers12:35

    xG 0.41–0.03 (92%)attempts 8–6goals 1–0

  2. Stephenson – Bjorkstrand – Burakovsky5:34

    xG 0.51–0.27 (65%)attempts 7–3goals 0–1

  3. Stephens – Tanev – Kartye3:27

    xG 0.22–0.07 (77%)attempts 4–4goals 0–1

  4. McCann – Tolvanen – Wright3:48

    xG 0.11–0.19 (38%)attempts 4–3goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestLarsson – Dunn13:39

    xG 0.77–0.10 (89%)attempts 17–5goals 0–1

  2. Montour – Evans13:56

    xG 0.64–0.51 (56%)attempts 12–12goals 2–1

  3. Montour – Dunn2:25

    xG 0.01–0.09 (9%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SEA 2.7 xGANA 2.4 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SEAANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SEA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SEA is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 87/100 · #168 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.91 · 10 goals in reachComeback index 28% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50SEA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 55% of the time.

SEA winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (SEA − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).