Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Jan 30, 2025·Climate Pledge Arena, Seattle

San Jose Sharks 2, Seattle Kraken 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 57% of the time.

SEA winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS1110918228
SEA1841718633

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:55SEAChandler StephensonAssists: Oliver Bjorkstrand, Eeli Tolvanen · Wrist, 0.05 xG0–1
  2. P1 17:55SJSCarl GrundstromAssists: Will Smith, Mikael Granlund · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P2 2:03SEAOliver BjorkstrandAssists: Chandler Stephenson, Vince Dunn · Wrist, 0.18 xG1–2
  4. P2 2:54SEABrandon MontourGWGAssists: Shane Wright · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–3
  5. P2 5:58SEAJaden SchwartzAssists: Jamie Oleksiak · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–4
  6. P2 7:52SEABrandon MontourPPAssists: Jared McCann, Chandler Stephenson · Slap, 0.21 xG1–5
  7. P3 8:06SJSTyler ToffoliAssists: Macklin Celebrini, Henry Thrun · Wrist, 0.10 xG2–5
  8. P3 12:18SEAEeli TolvanenAssists: Josh Mahura · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–6
Penalties (6)
  1. P2 3:47SEAJaden Schwartz: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 6:39SJSNikolai Kovalenko: Roughing2 min · PPG
  3. P2 6:39SJSHenry Thrun: Fighting5 min
  4. P2 6:39SEAVince Dunn: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 7:27SJSLuke Kunin: Tripping2 min
  6. P3 15:05SEAMatty Beniers: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SEA
43% to win57% to win
← SJS attackSEA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Beniers won the faceoff against Granlund
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSSEA
28Shots on goal33
2.4Expected goals2.7
62Shot attempts61
22Faceoffs won35
2Power plays2
9Penalty minutes9
24Hits23
14Blocked shots18
15Giveaways20
5Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestToffoli – Eklund – Celebrini13:30

    xG 0.98–0.38 (72%)attempts 19–16goals 1–1

  2. Goodrow – Kunin – Grundstrom4:09

    xG 0.16–0.15 (51%)attempts 6–2goals 0–1

  3. White – Grundstrom – Duehr4:48

    xG 0.08–0.26 (23%)attempts 5–7goals 0–1

  4. Goodrow – Kunin – Kovalenko8:08

    xG 0.08–0.61 (12%)attempts 3–12goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Ceci – Ferraro2:27

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–0goals 0–0

  2. Ceci – Walman15:01

    xG 0.50–0.53 (49%)attempts 17–14goals 1–2

  3. Vlasic – Thrun13:40

    xG 0.19–0.58 (24%)attempts 6–16goals 0–1

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. bestStephenson – Bjorkstrand – Tolvanen10:15

    xG 0.49–0.14 (78%)attempts 13–7goals 3–0

  2. Burakovsky – McCann – Wright9:55

    xG 0.58–0.27 (68%)attempts 12–9goals 1–1

  3. Schwartz – Kakko – Beniers12:47

    xG 0.73–0.48 (60%)attempts 17–15goals 0–1

  4. Stephens – Tanev – Kartye7:03

    xG 0.07–0.14 (33%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestOleksiak – Montour19:34

    xG 1.13–0.95 (54%)attempts 24–22goals 1–1

  2. Mahura – Fleury12:19

    xG 0.32–0.19 (62%)attempts 10–10goals 1–0

  3. Larsson – Dunn16:18

    xG 0.44–0.47 (48%)attempts 17–13goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SEA 2.7 xGSJS 2.4 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SEASJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SEA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SEA is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 41/100 · #771 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.77 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 56% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50SEA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 57% of the time.

SEA winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (SEA − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).