Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 1, 2025·Amerant Bank Arena, Sunrise

Chicago Blackhawks 1, Florida Panthers 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 93% of the time.

FLA winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI1401209125
FLA22211428544

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:07CHILandon SlaggertAssists: Ryan Donato · Backhand, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P1 5:28FLAJonah GadjovichAssists: A.J. Greer, Niko Mikkola · Wrist, 0.24 xG1–1
  3. P1 10:19FLASam ReinhartGWGAssists: Aleksander Barkov, Aaron Ekblad · Wrist, 0.24 xG1–2
  4. P2 16:29FLAMatthew TkachukAssists: Sam Reinhart, Carter Verhaeghe · Tip-in, 0.12 xG1–3
  5. P3 0:10FLAEvan RodriguesAssists: Anton Lundell · Snap, 0.11 xG1–4
  6. P3 9:37FLACarter VerhaeghePPAssists: Sam Reinhart, Aleksander Barkov · Wrist, 0.18 xG1–5
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 2:43CHIJason Dickinson: Interference2 min
  2. P1 5:28CHIRyan Donato: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min
  3. P1 11:00FLAJonah Gadjovich: Boarding2 min
  4. P2 3:59FLANiko Mikkola: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 12:06CHILandon Slaggert: High sticking double minor4 min
  6. P2 12:38FLAEvan Rodrigues: Holding2 min
  7. P3 4:56FLAEvan Rodrigues: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 9:14CHIIlya Mikheyev: High sticking2 min · PPG
  9. P3 14:19CHIColton Dach: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
43% to win57% to win
← CHI attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Donato won the faceoff against Bennett
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHIFLA
25Shots on goal44
2.0Expected goals5.8
45Shot attempts88
35Faceoffs won36
3Power plays6
12Penalty minutes8
15Hits31
19Blocked shots6
10Giveaways7
5Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestDonato – Slaggert – Bedard3:58

    xG 0.83–0.09 (90%)attempts 11–4goals 0–0

  2. Foligno – Bertuzzi – Nazar2:05

    xG 0.00–0.06 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

  3. Foligno – Donato – Slaggert3:25

    xG 0.10–0.16 (37%)attempts 2–5goals 1–0

  4. Teravainen – Dickinson – Mikheyev7:18

    xG 0.13–0.26 (33%)attempts 4–7goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Brodie – Vlasic6:47

    xG 0.29–0.25 (54%)attempts 9–4goals 0–0

  2. Martinez – Jones8:08

    xG 0.49–0.76 (39%)attempts 12–14goals 0–0

  3. Martinez – Murphy7:20

    xG 0.21–0.49 (30%)attempts 5–12goals 0–1

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestVerhaeghe – Barkov – Reinhart10:15

    xG 1.56–0.18 (90%)attempts 24–6goals 1–0

  2. Nosek – Greer – Gadjovich8:14

    xG 0.71–0.09 (88%)attempts 14–5goals 1–0

  3. Bennett – Tkachuk – Boqvist9:08

    xG 0.96–0.55 (64%)attempts 14–9goals 0–1

  4. Rodrigues – Luostarinen – Lundell9:15

    xG 0.31–0.46 (40%)attempts 10–11goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkblad – Forsling12:00

    xG 1.62–0.72 (69%)attempts 28–16goals 1–0

  2. Kulikov – Mikkola14:59

    xG 1.06–0.42 (72%)attempts 23–9goals 2–0

  3. Schmidt – Balinskis12:01

    xG 0.26–0.36 (42%)attempts 10–10goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 5.8 xGCHI 2.0 xG
0123456P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLACHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 30/100 · #922 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.00 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 42% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 93% of the time.

FLA winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).