Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Feb 2, 2025·Climate Pledge Arena, Seattle

Calgary Flames 3, Seattle Kraken 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 63% of the time.

SEA winsCGY wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CGY31801106335
SEA08112111231

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 14:03CGYMorgan FrostAssists: Yegor Sharangovich, Martin Pospisil · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–0
  2. P1 16:43CGYYegor SharangovichPPAssists: Mikael Backlund, Rasmus Andersson · Wrist, 0.15 xG2–0
  3. P1 17:56CGYJonathan HuberdeauPPGWGAssists: Nazem Kadri, MacKenzie Weegar · Slap, 0.20 xG3–0
  4. P2 14:31SEAKaapo KakkoAssists: Jaden Schwartz, Josh Mahura · Snap, 0.07 xG3–1
  5. P3 5:41SEABrandon TanevAssists: Jared McCann, Shane Wright · Deflected, 0.07 xG3–2
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 2:27SEABrandon Montour: Interference2 min
  2. P1 10:46CGYMatt Coronato: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 15:18SEAJared McCann: Roughing2 min · PPG
  4. P1 15:18CGYBrayden Pachal: Roughing2 min
  5. P1 15:18SEAJared McCann: Roughing2 min
  6. P1 16:43SEAJamie Oleksiak: Slashing2 min · PPG
  7. P1 16:43SEAOliver Bjorkstrand: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min
  8. P1 0:00CGYMartin Pospisil: Slashing2 min
  9. P2 18:29SEAKaapo Kakko: Too many men on the ice2 min
  10. P3 7:05CGYDan Vladar: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  11. P3 19:43SEAShane Wright: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CGY00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SEA
43% to win57% to win
← CGY attackSEA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kadri won the faceoff against Beniers
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CGYSEA
35Shots on goal31
3.3Expected goals2.6
61Shot attempts72
39Faceoffs won30
5Power plays3
8Penalty minutes14
18Hits24
21Blocked shots13
11Giveaways16
5Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestFrost – Pospisil – Sharangovich8:27

    xG 0.38–0.16 (71%)attempts 16–4goals 1–0

  2. Backlund – Coleman – Coronato9:15

    xG 0.30–0.21 (59%)attempts 5–10goals 0–1

  3. Lomberg – Rooney – Klapka4:33

    xG 0.05–0.20 (20%)attempts 2–11goals 0–0

  4. Kadri – Huberdeau – Farabee10:09

    xG 0.28–0.73 (28%)attempts 8–24goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestPachal – Miromanov7:15

    xG 0.41–0.20 (68%)attempts 12–6goals 0–0

  2. Weegar – Bean17:21

    xG 0.57–0.46 (55%)attempts 21–16goals 0–1

  3. Hanley – Pachal2:01

    xG 0.00–0.25 (0%)attempts 0–5goals 0–0

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. bestBurakovsky – McCann – Wright7:52

    xG 0.67–0.15 (82%)attempts 17–6goals 0–0

  2. Stephens – Tanev – Kartye2:28

    xG 0.33–0.10 (76%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  3. Schwartz – Kakko – Beniers12:10

    xG 0.33–0.50 (40%)attempts 13–14goals 1–0

  4. Stephenson – Bjorkstrand – Tolvanen7:57

    xG 0.09–0.33 (22%)attempts 11–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLarsson – Oleksiak7:45

    xG 0.47–0.11 (81%)attempts 13–6goals 0–0

  2. Montour – Dunn10:22

    xG 0.69–0.50 (58%)attempts 22–12goals 1–0

  3. Mahura – Fleury6:06

    xG 0.23–0.14 (62%)attempts 8–6goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SEA 2.6 xGCGY 3.3 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SEACGY

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SEA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SEA is favoured, below it CGY. Dots are goals.

Excitement 61/100 · #507 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.29 · 5 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 41% (winner's lowest chance)
CGY 100%5050%50SEA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 63% of the time.

SEA winsCGY wins

Simulated goal difference (SEA − CGY), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).