Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Feb 4, 2025·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

New Jersey Devils 3, Pittsburgh Penguins 2 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 60% of the time.

PIT winsNJD wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
NJD161904023321
PIT091818022227

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 19:43NJDJack HughesAssists: Jesper Bratt, Ondrej Palat · Deflected, 0.18 xG1–0
  2. P2 9:14NJDJack HughesAssists: Jesper Bratt · Slap, 0.11 xG2–0
  3. P2 14:56PITRickard RakellAssists: Sidney Crosby, Erik Karlsson · Wrap-around, 0.06 xG2–1
  4. P3 7:53PITKevin HayesAssists: Pierre-Olivier Joseph, Anthony Beauvillier · Wrist, 0.15 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. PIT Rickard Rakell scored
  2. 2. NJD Paul Cotter scored
  3. 3. PIT Sidney Crosby stopped
  4. 4. NJD Jack Hughes stopped
  5. 5. PIT Bryan Rust stopped
  6. 6. NJD Jesper Bratt stopped
  7. 7. PIT Anthony Beauvillier scored
  8. 8. NJD Dougie Hamilton scored
  9. 9. PIT Kevin Hayes stopped
  10. 10. NJD Tomas Tatar stopped
  11. 11. PIT Kris Letang stopped
  12. 12. NJD Luke Hughes stopped
  13. 13. PIT Cody Glass stopped
  14. 14. NJD Timo Meier scored
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 13:18NJDBrett Pesce: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 16:55NJDCurtis Lazar: Interference2 min
  3. P2 3:57PITPierre-Olivier Joseph: High sticking double minor4 min
  4. P2 8:56PITCody Glass: Holding2 min
  5. P2 8:56NJDErik Haula: Elbowing2 min
  6. P2 16:42PITRyan Graves: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 16:46NJDOndrej Palat: High sticking2 min
  8. P3 6:37PITKris Letang: Slashing2 min
  9. P3 6:37NJDPaul Cotter: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NJD00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
43% to win57% to win
← NJD attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Haula won the faceoff against Glass
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NJDPIT
21Shots on goal27
2.4Expected goals3.0
56Shot attempts58
20Faceoffs won34
3Power plays3
10Penalty minutes10
21Hits19
10Blocked shots21
16Giveaways19
5Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

New Jersey Devils

Forward lines

  1. bestHaula – Noesen – Meier2:25

    xG 0.13–0.00 (97%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  2. Haula – Meier – Mercer7:25

    xG 0.19–0.17 (52%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

  3. Palat – Bratt – Hughes9:28

    xG 0.39–0.42 (48%)attempts 11–9goals 1–0

  4. Tatar – Lazar – Bastian5:06

    xG 0.00–0.14 (0%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestDillon – Hamilton3:39

    xG 0.13–0.01 (91%)attempts 7–1goals 0–0

  2. Dillon – Kovacevic4:56

    xG 0.21–0.20 (51%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  3. Hamilton – Siegenthaler2:29

    xG 0.05–0.13 (28%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestHeinen – Bunting – Glass8:22

    xG 0.38–0.12 (76%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0

  2. Crosby – Rust – Rakell10:14

    xG 0.29–0.13 (70%)attempts 12–6goals 0–0

  3. Hayes – Beauvillier – Tomasino7:30

    xG 0.23–0.07 (78%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

  4. Imama – Acciari – Lizotte3:32

    xG 0.01–0.02 (27%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGraves – Desharnais9:50

    xG 0.47–0.10 (83%)attempts 9–10goals 0–0

  2. Karlsson – Grzelcyk16:49

    xG 0.45–0.27 (63%)attempts 13–15goals 0–0

  3. Letang – Joseph13:07

    xG 0.14–0.32 (31%)attempts 11–8goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 3.0 xGNJD 2.4 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITNJD

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it NJD. Dots are goals.

Excitement 72/100 · #356 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.75 · 4 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 41% (winner's lowest chance)
NJD 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +33 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 60% of the time.

PIT winsNJD wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − NJD), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).