Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Feb 9, 2025·Capital One Arena, Washington

Utah Hockey Club 5, Washington Capitals 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Washington Capitals win this game 65% of the time.

WSH winsUTA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
UTA3911107001527
WSH214010215030442

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:10UTAJosh DoanAssists: Jack McBain, Connor Ingram · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–0
  2. P1 1:42UTAMichael CarconeAssists: Dylan Guenther, Nick DeSimone · Tip-in, 0.14 xG2–0
  3. P1 3:47WSHTom WilsonPPAssists: Pierre-Luc Dubois, Dylan Strome · Slap, 0.16 xG2–1
  4. P1 7:07UTAJack McBainAssists: Michael Kesselring, Josh Doan · Wrist, 0.10 xG3–1
  5. P1 12:38WSHPierre-Luc DuboisPPAssists: Tom Wilson, Alex Ovechkin · Wrist, 0.10 xG3–2
  6. P2 2:47UTADylan GuentherPPAssists: Clayton Keller, Mikhail Sergachev · Slap, 0.10 xG4–2
  7. P3 4:49WSHDylan StromeAssists: Alex Ovechkin, Connor McMichael · Wrist, 0.23 xG4–3
  8. P3 18:29WSHTom WilsonAssists: Alex Ovechkin, John Carlson · Deflected, 0.14 xG4–4

Shootout

  1. 1. WSH Pierre-Luc Dubois stopped
  2. 2. UTA Nick Schmaltz scored
  3. 3. WSH Aliaksei Protas stopped
  4. 4. UTA Clayton Keller stopped
  5. 5. WSH Dylan Strome stopped
Penalties (3)
  1. P1 3:15UTAOlli Maatta: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 11:39UTAKevin Stenlund: Tripping2 min · PPG
  3. P2 1:29WSHBrandon Duhaime: Holding2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

UTA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0WSH
43% to win57% to win
← UTA attackWSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kerfoot won the faceoff against Dubois
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

UTAWSH
27Shots on goal42
3.2Expected goals4.0
61Shot attempts67
24Faceoffs won34
1Power plays2
4Penalty minutes2
13Hits13
13Blocked shots13
17Giveaways12
2Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Utah Hockey Club

Forward lines

  1. bestCarcone – Hayton – Guenther9:07

    xG 0.65–0.09 (88%)attempts 8–5goals 1–0

  2. Bjugstad – O'Brien – Stenlund10:09

    xG 0.53–0.50 (51%)attempts 13–6goals 0–0

  3. Crouse – McBain – Doan11:31

    xG 0.31–0.34 (48%)attempts 9–12goals 2–0

  4. Kerfoot – Schmaltz – Keller13:08

    xG 0.44–0.82 (35%)attempts 11–20goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCole – Kesselring14:30

    xG 0.74–0.59 (55%)attempts 18–14goals 1–0

  2. Maatta – DeSimone13:49

    xG 0.41–0.61 (40%)attempts 8–13goals 1–0

  3. Marino – Sergachev18:23

    xG 0.68–1.17 (37%)attempts 15–19goals 0–1

Washington Capitals

Forward lines

  1. bestWilson – Dubois – Protas7:10

    xG 0.53–0.19 (74%)attempts 13–4goals 0–0

  2. Dubois – McMichael – Protas7:31

    xG 0.70–0.40 (64%)attempts 11–7goals 0–0

  3. Dowd – Mangiapane – Duhaime5:41

    xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  4. Eller – Raddysh – Frank5:04

    xG 0.35–0.32 (52%)attempts 5–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestCarlson – Sandin6:26

    xG 0.82–0.12 (87%)attempts 14–3goals 0–0

  2. van Riemsdyk – Sandin8:48

    xG 0.73–0.54 (58%)attempts 9–9goals 1–0

  3. Roy – Chychrun2:27

    xG 0.11–0.04 (71%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

WSH 4.0 xGUTA 3.2 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

WSHUTA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

WSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line WSH is favoured, below it UTA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 94/100 · #83 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.36 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 43% (winner's lowest chance)
UTA 100%5050%50WSH 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +47 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Washington Capitals win this game 65% of the time.

WSH winsUTA wins

Simulated goal difference (WSH − UTA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).