Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Feb 23, 2025·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

San Jose Sharks 2, Calgary Flames 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 55% of the time.

CGY winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS1801318229
CGY11411319336

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:41SJSMacklin CelebriniAssists: Tyler Toffoli, Jake Walman · Wrist, 0.21 xG1–0
  2. P1 7:27CGYNazem KadriPPAssists: Morgan Frost, MacKenzie Weegar · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–1
  3. P2 3:35CGYKevin RooneyAssists: Ryan Lomberg, Martin Pospisil · Backhand, 0.16 xG1–2
  4. P3 1:54SJSTyler ToffoliAssists: William Eklund, Shakir Mukhamadullin · Backhand, 0.10 xG2–2
  5. P3 13:28CGYJoel HanleyGWGAssists: Jonathan Huberdeau, Nazem Kadri · Wrist, 0.17 xG2–3
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 6:47SJSHenry Thrun: Holding2 min · PPG
  2. P1 9:44CGYMacKenzie Weegar: Holding2 min
  3. P1 16:12SJSJake Walman: Interference2 min
  4. P2 11:38CGYMorgan Frost: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  5. P2 18:58SJSWilliam Eklund: Cross checking2 min
  6. P3 7:04SJSNico Sturm: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 9:00CGYBlake Coleman: Hooking2 min
  8. P3 12:49SJSTy Dellandrea: Holding2 min
  9. P3 12:49CGYMikael Backlund: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 17:04SJSHenry Thrun: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  11. P3 19:11SJSWilliam Eklund: Slashing2 min
  12. P3 19:11SJSWilliam Eklund: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
43% to win57% to win
← SJS attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kadri won the faceoff against Sturm
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSCGY
29Shots on goal36
2.8Expected goals3.0
75Shot attempts73
37Faceoffs won28
3Power plays6
24Penalty minutes8
22Hits23
23Blocked shots20
12Giveaways18
5Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestToffoli – Eklund – Celebrini8:24

    xG 0.81–0.36 (69%)attempts 18–7goals 2–0

  2. Wennberg – Zetterlund – Smith7:43

    xG 0.28–0.01 (96%)attempts 11–3goals 0–0

  3. Kunin – Sturm – Graf7:50

    xG 0.37–0.25 (60%)attempts 12–13goals 0–0

  4. Goodrow – Dellandrea – Duehr6:03

    xG 0.27–0.41 (40%)attempts 4–13goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestWalman – Thrun8:56

    xG 0.43–0.06 (88%)attempts 12–8goals 1–0

  2. Walman – Thompson3:13

    xG 0.42–0.09 (82%)attempts 9–3goals 0–0

  3. Ferraro – Mukhamadullin2:20

    xG 0.27–0.01 (98%)attempts 3–1goals 1–0

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. Lomberg – Rooney – Pospisil6:08

    xG 0.33–0.32 (50%)attempts 9–9goals 1–0

  2. Frost – Farabee – Sharangovich6:58

    xG 0.12–0.13 (49%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

  3. Backlund – Coleman – Zary10:07

    xG 0.38–0.52 (42%)attempts 14–14goals 0–1

  4. Kadri – Huberdeau – Coronato8:57

    xG 0.38–0.58 (40%)attempts 13–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestWeegar – Hanley13:12

    xG 0.37–0.23 (62%)attempts 13–12goals 0–0

  2. Andersson – Bean2:21

    xG 0.07–0.01 (88%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  3. Bean – Pachal9:47

    xG 0.36–0.54 (40%)attempts 12–8goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 3.0 xGSJS 2.8 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 50/100 · #648 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.62 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 42% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +33 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 55% of the time.

CGY winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).