Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 1, 2025·Honda Center, Anaheim

Chicago Blackhawks 6, Anaheim Ducks 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 51% of the time.

ANA winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI083838624
ANA010211110331

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 7:48CHIWyatt KaiserAssists: Teuvo Teravainen, Ilya Mikheyev · Snap, 0.13 xG1–0
  2. P2 8:33ANALeo CarlssonAssists: Frank Vatrano · Backhand, 0.11 xG1–1
  3. P2 10:24CHIPatrick MaroonPPAssists: Lukas Reichel, Alec Martinez · Wrist, 0.20 xG2–1
  4. P2 13:16CHITeuvo TeravainenAssists: Ryan Donato, TJ Brodie · Wrist, 0.10 xG3–1
  5. P2 14:41ANAJackson LaCombeAssists: Ryan Strome, Frank Vatrano · Wrist, 0.14 xG3–2
  6. P3 4:53CHILukas ReichelGWGAssists: Craig Smith, Alec Martinez · Snap, 0.22 xG4–2
  7. P3 7:40CHIRyan DonatoPPAssists: Tyler Bertuzzi, Alex Vlasic · Wrist, 0.42 xG5–2
  8. P3 10:56CHIRyan DonatoAssists: Teuvo Teravainen · Wrist, 0.14 xG6–2
  9. P3 17:16ANALeo CarlssonAssists: Brian Dumoulin · Snap, 0.07 xG6–3
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 9:23ANARoss Johnston: Roughing2 min
  2. P1 9:23ANARoss Johnston: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 9:23CHIColton Dach: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 14:59CHIColton Dach: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 0:57CHIConnor Murphy: Cross checking2 min
  6. P2 0:57ANAFrank Vatrano: Cross checking2 min
  7. P2 0:57CHIConnor Murphy: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 0:57ANAFrank Vatrano: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 8:51ANADrew Helleson: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  10. P3 2:42CHIColton Dach: Cross checking2 min
  11. P3 7:04ANARadko Gudas: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  12. P3 7:04ANAAlex Killorn: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
43% to win57% to win
← CHI attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Carlsson won the faceoff against Donato
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHIANA
24Shots on goal31
3.4Expected goals3.4
49Shot attempts64
21Faceoffs won32
4Power plays2
10Penalty minutes14
12Hits27
16Blocked shots10
15Giveaways16
8Takeaways1

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestTeravainen – Donato – Mikheyev11:08

    xG 0.75–0.50 (60%)attempts 12–12goals 3–0

  2. Slaggert – Dach – Nazar8:43

    xG 0.34–0.24 (59%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  3. Athanasiou – Bertuzzi – Bedard12:00

    xG 0.38–0.52 (42%)attempts 9–16goals 0–1

  4. Maroon – Smith – Reichel8:02

    xG 0.34–0.58 (37%)attempts 9–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrodie – Del Mastro3:07

    xG 0.45–0.14 (76%)attempts 7–3goals 1–0

  2. Murphy – Del Mastro10:10

    xG 0.29–0.07 (81%)attempts 5–3goals 0–1

  3. Vlasic – Del Mastro2:08

    xG 0.17–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestStrome – Vatrano – Terry11:38

    xG 0.88–0.38 (70%)attempts 17–6goals 1–1

  2. Johnston – Harkins – Leason6:00

    xG 0.13–0.14 (49%)attempts 1–5goals 0–0

  3. Killorn – McTavish – Carlsson11:29

    xG 0.46–0.51 (47%)attempts 14–9goals 1–0

  4. Lundeström – Colangelo – Gauthier6:17

    xG 0.24–0.40 (37%)attempts 8–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGudas – LaCombe18:26

    xG 1.20–0.80 (60%)attempts 28–14goals 2–0

  2. Trouba – Mintyukov13:28

    xG 0.42–0.22 (66%)attempts 9–11goals 0–0

  3. Dumoulin – Trouba3:27

    xG 0.20–0.01 (96%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 3.4 xGCHI 3.4 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANACHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 71/100 · #368 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.58 · 8 goals in reachComeback index 41% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +23 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 51% of the time.

ANA winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).