Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Mar 4, 2025·Rogers Place, Edmonton

Anaheim Ducks 6, Edmonton Oilers 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 69% of the time.

EDM winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA4111719627
EDM11209114235

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:05EDMLeon DraisaitlPPAssists: Connor McDavid, Mattias Ekholm · Snap, 0.12 xG0–1
  2. P1 11:57ANALeo CarlssonUnassisted · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–1
  3. P1 13:37ANAMason McTavishAssists: Cutter Gauthier, Jackson LaCombe · Snap, 0.02 xG2–1
  4. P1 18:26ANASam ColangeloGWGAssists: Jackson LaCombe, Cutter Gauthier · Tip-in, 0.04 xG3–1
  5. P1 18:38ANAMason McTavishAssists: Sam Colangelo, Cutter Gauthier · Snap, 0.29 xG4–1
  6. P2 13:22ANARyan StromeAssists: Jackson LaCombe, Frank Vatrano · Wrist, 0.16 xG5–1
  7. P3 3:56ANAAlex KillornAssists: Trevor Zegras, Leo Carlsson · Snap, 0.27 xG6–1
  8. P3 4:44EDMConnor McDavidPPAssists: Leon Draisaitl, Evan Bouchard · Wrist, 0.21 xG6–2
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 8:21ANAFrank Vatrano: Slashing2 min · PPG
  2. P2 3:10EDMJohn Klingberg: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  3. P3 4:24ANASam Colangelo: Holding2 min · PPG
  4. P3 6:00EDMDarnell Nurse: Interference2 min
  5. P3 15:15ANADrew Helleson: Roughing2 min
  6. P3 15:15EDMConnor Brown: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
43% to win57% to win
← ANA attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00McDavid won the faceoff against Strome
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANAEDM
27Shots on goal35
2.7Expected goals3.9
45Shot attempts71
25Faceoffs won32
2Power plays2
6Penalty minutes6
21Hits28
15Blocked shots11
14Giveaways9
4Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestColangelo – McTavish – Gauthier10:12

    xG 0.84–0.78 (52%)attempts 11–18goals 3–0

  2. Harkins – Lundeström – Leason7:59

    xG 0.20–0.57 (26%)attempts 8–9goals 0–0

  3. Strome – Vatrano – Terry12:06

    xG 0.30–0.67 (31%)attempts 5–15goals 1–0

  4. Killorn – Zegras – Carlsson12:55

    xG 0.51–0.99 (34%)attempts 9–15goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. Trouba – Mintyukov12:31

    xG 0.62–0.68 (48%)attempts 9–15goals 1–0

  2. Dumoulin – Trouba4:38

    xG 0.06–0.22 (22%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

  3. Gudas – LaCombe19:05

    xG 1.11–1.38 (45%)attempts 18–20goals 5–0

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestNugent-Hopkins – Arvidsson – Savoie3:22

    xG 0.48–0.05 (91%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  2. Hyman – Nugent-Hopkins – McDavid6:34

    xG 0.62–0.18 (77%)attempts 12–3goals 0–0

  3. Henrique – Brown – Janmark8:36

    xG 0.52–0.22 (70%)attempts 10–6goals 0–1

  4. Hyman – Draisaitl – McDavid6:44

    xG 0.56–0.31 (64%)attempts 7–7goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkholm – Bouchard11:21

    xG 0.82–0.17 (82%)attempts 18–6goals 0–0

  2. Klingberg – Kulak11:28

    xG 1.05–0.73 (59%)attempts 20–9goals 0–1

  3. Klingberg – Bouchard2:14

    xG 0.25–0.02 (92%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 3.9 xGANA 2.7 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 42/100 · #760 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.89 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 31% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 69% of the time.

EDM winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).