Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Mar 5, 2025·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

Anaheim Ducks 2, Vancouver Canucks 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 84% of the time.

VAN winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA150516216
VAN01737012336

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 13:21ANASam ColangeloAssists: Cutter Gauthier, Mason McTavish · Tip-in, 0.07 xG1–0
  2. P2 1:05VANJake DeBruskPPAssists: Brock Boeser, Filip Hronek · Wrist, 0.20 xG1–1
  3. P2 10:33VANTeddy BluegerAssists: Filip Hronek, Elias Pettersson · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–2
  4. P2 18:51VANCarson SoucyGWGAssists: Nils Hoglander, Kiefer Sherwood · Slap, 0.03 xG1–3
  5. P3 13:27ANABrian DumoulinAssists: Isac Lundeström, Brett Leason · Wrist, 0.14 xG2–3
Penalties (15)
  1. P1 7:03ANARyan Strome: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 14:44ANARadko Gudas: Roughing2 min
  3. P2 0:41ANARyan Strome: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 4:50VANMarcus Pettersson: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 13:48VANDrew O'Connor: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  6. P2 18:51ANAMason McTavish: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min
  7. P3 6:02VANDrew O'Connor: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 6:02ANAJacob Trouba: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 15:09ANAFrank Vatrano: Hooking2 min
  10. P3 19:54VANDerek Forbort: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 19:54VANDerek Forbort: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 19:54ANAJacob Trouba: Roughing2 min
  13. P3 19:54ANAJacob Trouba: Roughing2 min
  14. P3 19:54ANATrevor Zegras: Fighting5 min
  15. P3 19:54VANConor Garland: Fighting5 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
43% to win57% to win
← ANA attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Pettersson won the faceoff against Strome
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANAVAN
16Shots on goal36
1.5Expected goals3.6
45Shot attempts59
17Faceoffs won41
2Power plays5
21Penalty minutes15
20Hits26
12Blocked shots15
11Giveaways18
1Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. Killorn – Zegras – Carlsson8:51

    xG 0.23–0.33 (41%)attempts 11–8goals 0–0

  2. Harkins – Lundeström – Leason6:33

    xG 0.21–0.33 (40%)attempts 6–8goals 1–1

  3. Colangelo – McTavish – Gauthier8:28

    xG 0.14–0.42 (25%)attempts 6–14goals 1–0

  4. Strome – Vatrano – Terry9:53

    xG 0.19–0.71 (21%)attempts 9–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestDumoulin – Helleson10:14

    xG 0.51–0.28 (64%)attempts 12–6goals 1–0

  2. Dumoulin – Trouba2:52

    xG 0.16–0.24 (39%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  3. Trouba – Mintyukov11:26

    xG 0.25–0.82 (23%)attempts 12–20goals 1–1

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestJoshua – Garland – Pettersson9:28

    xG 0.90–0.04 (96%)attempts 14–2goals 0–0

  2. Blueger – Sherwood – Hoglander8:49

    xG 0.37–0.03 (94%)attempts 11–6goals 1–0

  3. Chytil – O'Connor – Lekkerimäki6:26

    xG 0.44–0.20 (69%)attempts 11–3goals 0–1

  4. Boeser – DeBrusk – Suter7:39

    xG 0.29–0.45 (40%)attempts 4–18goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMyers – Pettersson13:02

    xG 0.84–0.20 (81%)attempts 15–14goals 1–0

  2. Hronek – Pettersson7:44

    xG 0.56–0.00 (100%)attempts 11–0goals 0–0

  3. Forbort – Soucy11:44

    xG 0.46–0.15 (76%)attempts 12–7goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 3.6 xGANA 1.5 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 38/100 · #802 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.29 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 36% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 84% of the time.

VAN winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).