Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 8, 2025·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Montréal Canadiens 0, Calgary Flames 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 72% of the time.

CGY winsMTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MTL04012010026
CGY0911005124

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 16:21CGYJoel FarabeeGWGAssists: Mikael Backlund, MacKenzie Weegar · Wrist, 0.08 xG0–1
Penalties (3)
  1. P1 12:20MTLArber Xhekaj: Interference2 min
  2. P2 7:33CGYMikael Backlund: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 19:43CGYJonathan Huberdeau: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MTL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
43% to win57% to win
← MTL attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Dvorak won the faceoff against Kadri
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MTLCGY
26Shots on goal24
2.8Expected goals1.6
57Shot attempts53
39Faceoffs won18
2Power plays1
2Penalty minutes4
25Hits18
16Blocked shots9
17Giveaways24
7Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestSuzuki – Caufield – Slafkovský13:42

    xG 0.95–0.50 (66%)attempts 16–12goals 0–0

  2. Armia – Evans – Heineman6:31

    xG 0.29–0.00 (100%)attempts 9–0goals 0–0

  3. Anderson – Newhook – Beck8:28

    xG 0.28–0.10 (74%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  4. Gallagher – Dvorak – Pezzetta3:56

    xG 0.04–0.11 (25%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMatheson – Carrier13:28

    xG 0.56–0.15 (79%)attempts 11–10goals 0–0

  2. Struble – Hutson12:10

    xG 0.67–0.38 (64%)attempts 12–15goals 0–1

  3. Carrier – Struble2:37

    xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestKadri – Huberdeau – Coronato6:30

    xG 0.15–0.01 (97%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  2. Kadri – Huberdeau – Zary6:40

    xG 0.25–0.12 (68%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  3. Frost – Pospisil – Sharangovich9:08

    xG 0.41–0.35 (54%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0

  4. Lomberg – Rooney – Coronato3:24

    xG 0.01–0.06 (21%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestWeegar – Hanley18:52

    xG 0.59–0.38 (61%)attempts 19–13goals 0–0

  2. Andersson – Bahl17:41

    xG 0.54–0.58 (48%)attempts 19–18goals 0–0

  3. Bean – Pachal11:52

    xG 0.16–1.05 (13%)attempts 9–14goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 1.6 xGMTL 2.8 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYMTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it MTL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 1/100 · #1301 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.63 · 1 goal in reachComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
MTL 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 72% of the time.

CGY winsMTL wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − MTL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).