Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Mar 11, 2025·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

Nashville Predators 3, San Jose Sharks 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 54% of the time.

SJS winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NSH072814319
SJS0501329227

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 8:11NSHFilip ForsbergPPAssists: Fedor Svechkov, Nick Blankenburg · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–0
  2. P2 15:17NSHSteven StamkosPPAssists: Brady Skjei · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–0
  3. P3 3:42SJSPatrick GilesAssists: Carl Grundstrom · Wrist, 0.18 xG2–1
  4. P3 3:56SJSCollin GrafAssists: Will Smith · Wrist, 0.15 xG2–2
  5. P3 6:32NSHKieffer BellowsGWGAssists: Filip Forsberg · Wrist, 0.16 xG3–2
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 8:30NSHAndreas Englund: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 8:30SJSBarclay Goodrow: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 10:16SJSVincent Desharnais: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 10:16NSHCole Smith: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 10:16SJSVincent Desharnais: Fighting5 min
  6. P1 18:10NSHKieffer Bellows: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 6:49SJSMario Ferraro: Tripping2 min · PPG
  8. P2 11:28NSHBrady Skjei: Hooking2 min
  9. P2 14:05SJSBarclay Goodrow: Tripping2 min · PPG
  10. P2 15:39SJSTimothy Liljegren: Interference2 min
  11. P3 18:25SJSAlexander Wennberg: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
43% to win57% to win
← NSH attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Sissons won the faceoff against Celebrini
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHSJS
19Shots on goal27
2.6Expected goals2.4
42Shot attempts52
26Faceoffs won19
5Power plays2
14Penalty minutes20
23Hits15
12Blocked shots13
13Giveaways10
9Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestForsberg – McCarron – Bellows4:03

    xG 0.27–0.19 (58%)attempts 3–6goals 1–0

  2. McCarron – Bellows – Smith2:14

    xG 0.01–0.01 (53%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Marchessault – Forsberg – Sissons4:02

    xG 0.00–0.19 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

  4. Vrana – Smith – Svechkov6:04

    xG 0.25–0.50 (33%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestStastney – Del Gaizo8:08

    xG 0.44–0.10 (82%)attempts 9–3goals 1–0

  2. Oesterle – Barron5:18

    xG 0.00–0.02 (0%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

  3. Skjei – Blankenburg10:26

    xG 0.33–0.40 (45%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestGoodrow – Grundstrom – Giles6:22

    xG 0.56–0.01 (99%)attempts 9–3goals 1–0

  2. Toffoli – Eklund – Celebrini7:31

    xG 0.31–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–0goals 0–0

  3. Dellandrea – Kovalenko – Graf3:44

    xG 0.44–0.17 (72%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  4. Toffoli – Wennberg – Eklund7:12

    xG 0.18–0.06 (77%)attempts 10–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestFerraro – Mukhamadullin13:42

    xG 0.99–0.31 (77%)attempts 10–9goals 2–1

  2. Vlasic – Liljegren9:15

    xG 0.47–0.36 (57%)attempts 10–7goals 0–0

  3. Desharnais – Schuldt11:34

    xG 0.10–0.02 (82%)attempts 10–3goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 2.4 xGNSH 2.6 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSNSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 72/100 · #358 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.74 · 5 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 42% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +32 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 54% of the time.

SJS winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).