Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 22, 2025·Rogers Place, Edmonton

Seattle Kraken 4, Edmonton Oilers 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 52% of the time.

EDM winsSEA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SEA11119212432
EDM11031019529

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 14:30EDMAdam HenriquePPAssists: Mattias Ekholm, Darnell Nurse · Snap, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P1 15:49SEAKaapo KakkoPPAssists: Matty Beniers, Jani Nyman · Wrist, 0.33 xG1–1
  3. P2 3:48EDMRyan Nugent-HopkinsAssists: Kasperi Kapanen, Darnell Nurse · Snap, 0.06 xG1–2
  4. P2 7:01SEAKaapo KakkoAssists: Jani Nyman · Backhand, 0.13 xG2–2
  5. P2 12:31EDMJeff SkinnerAssists: Connor Brown, Mattias Ekholm · Snap, 0.16 xG2–3
  6. P2 18:11EDMRyan Nugent-HopkinsPPAssists: Zach Hyman, Evan Bouchard · Snap, 0.07 xG2–4
  7. P3 5:57SEAAndre BurakovskyAssists: Jared McCann · Snap, 0.04 xG3–4
  8. P3 17:43EDMRyan Nugent-HopkinsENGWGAssists: Jake Walman · Wrist, 0.29 xG3–5
  9. P3 17:57SEAJaden SchwartzPPAssists: Jared McCann, Vince Dunn · Tip-in, 0.14 xG4–5
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 12:38SEAAdam Larsson: Slashing2 min · PPG
  2. P1 15:11EDMBrett Kulak: Interference2 min · PPG
  3. P2 1:44EDMAdam Henrique: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 12:48SEAEeli Tolvanen: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 15:26SEAVince Dunn: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  6. P3 16:34EDMVasily Podkolzin: High sticking2 min · PPG
  7. P3 19:14SEAJared McCann: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SEA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
43% to win57% to win
← SEA attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Wright won the faceoff against Janmark
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SEAEDM
32Shots on goal29
3.7Expected goals3.8
54Shot attempts66
23Faceoffs won29
3Power plays5
10Penalty minutes6
18Hits13
21Blocked shots12
17Giveaways14
6Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. bestHayden – Eyssimont – Kartye5:26

    xG 1.54–0.17 (90%)attempts 15–5goals 0–1

  2. Burakovsky – McCann – Tolvanen7:40

    xG 0.09–0.24 (28%)attempts 6–8goals 1–0

  3. Kakko – Beniers – Nyman13:19

    xG 0.60–1.05 (36%)attempts 12–18goals 1–1

  4. Eberle – Schwartz – Wright12:50

    xG 0.36–0.99 (27%)attempts 6–16goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestOleksiak – Mahura11:31

    xG 0.97–0.33 (75%)attempts 14–9goals 0–0

  2. Montour – Evans13:20

    xG 0.52–0.71 (42%)attempts 13–13goals 2–1

  3. Larsson – Dunn16:26

    xG 0.95–1.17 (45%)attempts 12–25goals 0–0

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestSkinner – Brown – Janmark11:26

    xG 1.03–0.54 (66%)attempts 16–9goals 1–0

  2. Nugent-Hopkins – Arvidsson – Podkolzin11:15

    xG 0.61–0.19 (76%)attempts 13–9goals 0–0

  3. Kapanen – Ryan – Jones5:32

    xG 0.33–0.65 (33%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  4. Perry – Henrique – Hyman7:04

    xG 0.04–0.98 (4%)attempts 6–13goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkholm – Bouchard13:15

    xG 1.05–0.54 (66%)attempts 19–12goals 1–2

  2. Kulak – Stecher11:06

    xG 0.49–0.34 (59%)attempts 12–7goals 0–0

  3. Nurse – Walman14:58

    xG 0.75–1.58 (32%)attempts 15–19goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 3.8 xGSEA 3.7 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMSEA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it SEA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 78/100 · #281 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.64 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
SEA 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 52% of the time.

EDM winsSEA wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − SEA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).