Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Mar 25, 2025·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Seattle Kraken 3, Calgary Flames 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 53% of the time.

CGY winsSEA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
SEA082121603329
CGY1901021414437

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:58CGYAdam KlapkaAssists: Kevin Rooney, Daniil Miromanov · Wrist, 0.12 xG0–1
  2. P2 10:25SEAJaden SchwartzPPAssists: Jared McCann, Andre Burakovsky · Wrist, 0.29 xG1–1
  3. P2 18:42SEATye KartyeAssists: Vince Dunn · Snap, 0.09 xG2–1
  4. P3 13:42CGYNazem KadriPPAssists: Jonathan Huberdeau, Morgan Frost · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–2
  5. P3 15:49CGYRasmus AnderssonAssists: Matt Coronato, Jonathan Huberdeau · Slap, 0.01 xG2–3
  6. P3 18:30SEAJordan EberleAssists: Matty Beniers, Jaden Schwartz · Wrist, 0.32 xG3–3
  7. OT 3:58CGYNazem KadriGWGAssists: Matt Coronato · Wrist, 0.25 xG3–4
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 17:17CGYRyan Lomberg: Cross checking2 min
  2. P2 3:04SEABrandon Montour: Interference2 min
  3. P2 8:44CGYConnor Zary: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  4. P2 14:49CGYJoel Hanley: Hooking2 min
  5. P3 4:01CGYMatt Coronato: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 10:25SEABrandon Montour: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  7. P3 15:07SEAMichael Eyssimont: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 15:07CGYMartin Pospisil: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  9. P3 15:07CGYNazem Kadri: Fighting5 min
  10. P3 15:07SEABrandon Montour: Fighting5 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SEA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
43% to win57% to win
← SEA attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00McCann won the faceoff against Kadri
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SEACGY
29Shots on goal37
3.6Expected goals3.4
56Shot attempts81
27Faceoffs won31
4Power plays3
13Penalty minutes15
23Hits27
26Blocked shots12
16Giveaways16
4Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. bestHayden – Eyssimont – Kartye3:22

    xG 0.37–0.24 (60%)attempts 9–2goals 0–0

  2. Hayden – Eyssimont – Tolvanen2:14

    xG 0.03–0.07 (26%)attempts 1–5goals 0–0

  3. Eberle – Schwartz – Wright9:10

    xG 0.29–0.34 (46%)attempts 7–10goals 0–1

  4. Burakovsky – McCann – Tolvanen8:15

    xG 0.18–0.34 (35%)attempts 5–16goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLarsson – Dunn15:33

    xG 0.78–0.73 (52%)attempts 16–21goals 1–0

  2. Montour – Evans14:44

    xG 0.45–0.71 (38%)attempts 10–25goals 0–0

  3. Oleksiak – Fleury8:18

    xG 0.15–0.55 (21%)attempts 7–11goals 0–1

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestLomberg – Rooney – Klapka4:15

    xG 0.36–0.00 (100%)attempts 8–2goals 0–0

  2. Coleman – Farabee – Sharangovich9:08

    xG 0.44–0.18 (71%)attempts 15–7goals 0–0

  3. Huberdeau – Frost – Coronato9:54

    xG 0.35–0.26 (57%)attempts 9–7goals 1–1

  4. Kadri – Pospisil – Zary11:12

    xG 0.30–0.42 (42%)attempts 19–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestAndersson – Bahl12:58

    xG 0.72–0.19 (80%)attempts 23–5goals 1–1

  2. Bean – Miromanov9:10

    xG 0.60–0.41 (59%)attempts 13–9goals 1–0

  3. Weegar – Hanley14:25

    xG 0.53–0.50 (52%)attempts 13–13goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 3.4 xGSEA 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYSEA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it SEA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 94/100 · #80 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.73 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 15% (winner's lowest chance)
SEA 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +41 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 53% of the time.

CGY winsSEA wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − SEA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).