Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 27, 2025·Climate Pledge Arena, Seattle

Edmonton Oilers 1, Seattle Kraken 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 75% of the time.

SEA winsEDM wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
EDM012011114137
SEA01251718637

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 1:18SEAJaden SchwartzPPAssists: Andre Burakovsky, Jared McCann · Tip-in, 0.14 xG0–1
  2. P2 3:24SEAJaden SchwartzGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–2
  3. P2 10:50SEAJani NymanAssists: Adam Larsson, Vince Dunn · Tip-in, 0.08 xG0–3
  4. P2 11:06SEAMatty BeniersAssists: Kaapo Kakko, Jani Nyman · Snap, 0.22 xG0–4
  5. P2 12:41SEAAndre BurakovskyAssists: Ryker Evans · Wrist, 0.24 xG0–5
  6. P3 4:59EDMZach HymanUnassisted · Wrist, 0.17 xG1–5
  7. P3 8:53SEAJared McCannAssists: Michael Eyssimont, Adam Larsson · Bat, 0.10 xG1–6
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 3:48SEAShane Wright: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 4:01EDMEvan Bouchard: Interference2 min
  3. P1 7:15SEAKaapo Kakko: Too many men on the ice2 min
  4. P2 0:39EDMMattias Janmark: Hooking2 min · PPG
  5. P2 7:03SEAJordan Eberle: Holding the stick2 min
  6. P2 17:11SEABrandon Montour: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 19:27EDMZach Hyman: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 5:40EDMBrett Kulak: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

EDM00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SEA
43% to win57% to win
← EDM attackSEA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Wright won the faceoff against Janmark
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

EDMSEA
37Shots on goal37
2.6Expected goals4.3
71Shot attempts65
29Faceoffs won38
4Power plays4
8Penalty minutes8
26Hits15
5Blocked shots17
16Giveaways22
2Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestSkinner – Hyman – Nugent-Hopkins2:30

    xG 0.35–0.13 (73%)attempts 7–2goals 1–1

  2. Skinner – Hyman – Janmark3:28

    xG 0.15–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–0goals 0–0

  3. Perry – Henrique – Hyman3:40

    xG 0.24–0.12 (67%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  4. Skinner – Brown – Janmark4:29

    xG 0.45–0.37 (54%)attempts 6–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestNurse – Walman4:47

    xG 0.42–0.17 (71%)attempts 10–2goals 1–0

  2. Kulak – Nurse2:24

    xG 0.21–0.10 (69%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  3. Nurse – Emberson4:37

    xG 0.22–0.16 (58%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

Seattle Kraken

Forward lines

  1. bestKakko – Beniers – Nyman11:31

    xG 0.98–0.59 (62%)attempts 13–16goals 2–1

  2. Burakovsky – McCann – Tolvanen8:16

    xG 0.68–0.51 (57%)attempts 9–14goals 1–0

  3. Eberle – Schwartz – Wright12:06

    xG 0.38–0.38 (50%)attempts 9–14goals 0–0

  4. Hayden – Eyssimont – Kartye8:09

    xG 0.08–0.33 (19%)attempts 4–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLarsson – Dunn12:49

    xG 1.41–0.36 (79%)attempts 22–18goals 3–0

  2. Montour – Evans16:40

    xG 0.75–0.92 (45%)attempts 14–22goals 1–1

  3. Oleksiak – Mahura14:00

    xG 0.10–0.60 (14%)attempts 5–17goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SEA 4.3 xGEDM 2.6 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SEAEDM

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SEA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SEA is favoured, below it EDM. Dots are goals.

Excitement 13/100 · #1125 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.62 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 55% (winner's lowest chance)
EDM 100%5050%50SEA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +14 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Seattle Kraken win this game 75% of the time.

SEA winsEDM wins

Simulated goal difference (SEA − EDM), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).