Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Apr 1, 2025·Honda Center, Anaheim

San Jose Sharks 3, Anaheim Ducks 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 74% of the time.

ANA winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
SJS11301423010331
ANA31504015031437

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:04ANATrevor ZegrasAssists: Sam Colangelo, Mason McTavish · Tip-in, 0.07 xG0–1
  2. P1 5:28SJSShakir MukhamadullinAssists: Mario Ferraro, Ty Dellandrea · Snap, 0.01 xG1–1
  3. P1 8:13ANAJackson LaCombePPAssists: Trevor Zegras, Mason McTavish · Wrist, 0.02 xG1–2
  4. P1 19:01ANASam ColangeloAssists: Mason McTavish, Radko Gudas · Tip-in, 0.17 xG1–3
  5. P3 4:08SJSMarc-Edouard VlasicAssists: Jack Thompson · Snap, 0.10 xG2–3
  6. P3 16:46SJSAlexander WennbergAssists: William Eklund · Slap, 0.22 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. ANA Trevor Zegras stopped
  2. 2. SJS Will Smith stopped
  3. 3. ANA Leo Carlsson stopped
  4. 4. SJS Macklin Celebrini stopped
  5. 5. ANA Mason McTavish scored
  6. 6. SJS Tyler Toffoli stopped
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 7:01SJSMacklin Celebrini: Slashing2 min · PPG
  2. P1 10:09ANAOlen Zellweger: Holding the stick2 min
  3. P1 10:55ANADrew Helleson: High sticking2 min
  4. P3 0:35SJSShakir Mukhamadullin: Cross checking2 min
  5. P3 0:35ANAFrank Vatrano: Roughing2 min
  6. P3 1:14SJSWill Smith: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 9:39SJSCam Lund: Hooking2 min
  8. P3 10:03SJSBarclay Goodrow: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
43% to win57% to win
← SJS attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Celebrini won the faceoff against Strome
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSANA
31Shots on goal37
3.5Expected goals5.2
66Shot attempts73
24Faceoffs won25
2Power plays4
10Penalty minutes6
16Hits24
15Blocked shots13
13Giveaways9
4Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestWennberg – Eklund – Graf11:43

    xG 1.15–0.35 (77%)attempts 19–9goals 2–0

  2. Grundstrom – Dellandrea – Lund8:32

    xG 0.47–0.53 (47%)attempts 10–9goals 1–2

  3. Goodrow – Gregor – Ostapchuk6:07

    xG 0.17–0.25 (41%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

  4. Toffoli – Smith – Celebrini16:41

    xG 0.48–1.33 (26%)attempts 16–23goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestFerraro – Thompson2:35

    xG 0.17–0.05 (77%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  2. Ferraro – Mukhamadullin12:01

    xG 0.73–0.72 (50%)attempts 17–10goals 1–1

  3. Carlsson – Liljegren15:58

    xG 0.62–0.63 (50%)attempts 13–17goals 0–0

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestStrome – Vatrano – Terry12:27

    xG 0.78–0.11 (88%)attempts 17–3goals 0–0

  2. Zegras – Colangelo – McTavish10:10

    xG 0.75–0.74 (51%)attempts 12–17goals 1–1

  3. Killorn – Gauthier – Carlsson10:25

    xG 0.45–0.56 (44%)attempts 11–16goals 0–0

  4. Harkins – Lundeström – Nesterenko8:16

    xG 0.00–0.82 (0%)attempts 3–11goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestGudas – LaCombe18:45

    xG 1.15–0.48 (71%)attempts 19–14goals 0–0

  2. Helleson – Mintyukov11:26

    xG 0.37–0.37 (50%)attempts 6–13goals 1–1

  3. Trouba – Zellweger12:50

    xG 0.32–1.35 (19%)attempts 10–22goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 5.2 xGSJS 3.5 xG
0123456P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANASJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 73/100 · #347 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.75 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +37 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 74% of the time.

ANA winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).